ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Effects of bio-rational insecticides on selected biological aspects of the Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
 
More details
Hide details
1
Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, 41522, Ismailia, Egypt
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Mahmoud Farag Mahmoud
Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, 41522, Ismailia, Egypt
 
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2009;49(2):135–140
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Effectiveness of 8 bio-rational insecticides, Dipel 2x, BioFly , Agrin, BioGaurd, Spinosad, Neemix, Mectin and Match were tested at recommended dose, half of recommended dose and quarter of recommended dose against 1st, 3rd and 5th instar larvae and the egg masses (24, 48 and 72 h old) of the Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.)under laboratory conditions. All the bio-rational insecticides provided higher mortality in the first instar larvae comparing to the third and fifth instar larvae, although Match, Mectin and Spinosad showed also excellent efficacy against third larval stage of S. littoralis at all tested concentrations. Also, Match showed 100% mortality of fifth instar larvae at all tested concentrations. The mortality rates of S. littoralis eggs of different ages (24, 48 and 72 h old) when dipped in recommended dose of each insecticide diluted in water were investigated. At recommended dose of all insecticides eggs of different ages were highly affected and the reductions of hatchability were 83.4, 85.0 and 71.7%, respectively in Spinosad compared to the control. In general, eggs 48 and 72 h old were less sensitive than younger eggs 24 h old. The latent effect of bio-rational insecticides on egg hatchability of S. littoralis was observed only in Match and Neemix with the average being 55.0% and 51.6% respectively. Our results suggest that Match, Mectin and Spinosad are potentially effective compounds for control of S. littoralis
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
 
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Abo-El-Ghar M.R., Nassar M.E., Riskalla M.R., Abd-El-Ghafar S.F. 1986. Rate of development of resistance and pattern of cross-resistance in fenvalerate and decamethrin-resistant strains of Spodoptera littoralis. Agric. Res. Rev.61: 141–145.
 
2.
Ascher K.R.S. 1993. Nonconventional insecticidal effects of pesticides available from the Neem tree, Azadirachta indica. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 22: 433–449.
 
3.
Aydin H.M., Oktay G.R. 2006. The Efficacy of Spinosad on Different Strains of Spodoptera littoralis(Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Turk. J. Biol. 30: 5–9.
 
4.
Casana V.G., Gandia A.B., Mengod C.P., Primo J.M., Primo E.Y. 1999. Insect growthregulators as chemosterilants for Ceratitis capitata(Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 92 (2): 303–308.
 
5.
Corbitt T.S., Green A.S.J., Whight D.J. 1989. Relative potency of abamectin against larval stages of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.), Heliothis armigera (Hubn.) and Heliothis virescens (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Crop Prot. 8 (2): 127–132.
 
6.
El-Ghar G.E.S.A, Radwan H.A.S., El-Bermany Z.A., Zidan L.T.M. 1995. Sublethal effects of avrmectin B1, betaexotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis and diflubenzuron against cotton leafworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 119 (4): 309–313.
 
7.
Forgash A.J. 1984. History, evolution and consequences of insecticide resistance. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 22: 178–186.
 
8.
Georghiou G.P. 1986. The magnitude of the resistance problem. p. 14–43. In: “Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management”. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Hosny M.M., Topper C.P., Moawad G.G., El-Saadany G.B. 1986. Economic damage thresholds of Spodoptera littoralis(Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on cotton in Egypt. Crop Prot. 5: 100–104.
 
9.
Issa Y.H., Keddis M.E., Abdel-Sattar M.A., Ayad F.A., El-Guindy M.A. 1984a. Survey of resistance to organophosphorus insecticides in field strains of the cotton leaf-worm during 1980–1984 cotton-growing seasons. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Egypt, Economic Series14: 399–404.
 
10.
Issa Y.H., Keddis M.E., Abdel-Sattar M.A., Ayad F.A., El-Guindy M.A. 1984b. Survey of resistance to pyrethroids in field strains of the cotton leaf-worm during 1980–1984 cotton growing seasons. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Egypt, Economic Series14: 405–411.
 
11.
Pineda S., Budia F., Schneider M.I. 2004. Effects of two biorational insecticides, spinosad and methoxyfenozide, on Spodoptera littoralis(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under laboratory conditions. J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 1906–1911.
 
12.
Rao N.V., Reddy A.S., Reddy P.S. 1990. Relative efficacy of some new insecticides on insect pests of cotton. Indian J. Plant Prot. 18: 53–58.
 
13.
SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. 6.12 ed. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc.
 
14.
Sawicki R.M. 1986. Resistance to synthetic pyrethroids can be countered successfully. Agribusiness Worldwide 8: 22–25.
 
15.
Stark J.D., Vargas R., Miller N. 2004. Toxicity of spinosad in protein bait to three economically important tephritid fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 911–915.
 
16.
Thoppson G.D., Hutchins S.H., Sparks T.C. 1999. Development of spinosad and attributes of a new class of insect control products. Univ. of Minnesota. http://www.ipmworld.umn.edu/ch....
 
17.
Toppozada A., Abdallah S.A., El Defrawi M.E. 1966. Chemoster ilization of larvae and adult of the Egyptian cotton Lear worm, Spodoptera littoralis by apholate, metapa and tepa. J. Econ. Entomol. 75: 630–632.
 
eISSN:1899-007X
ISSN:1427-4345