ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Influence of some chemicals on the viability of Phomopsis viticola Sacc. spores
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Agriculture, Department of Plant Pathology Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Ewa Król
University of Agriculture, Department of Plant Pathology Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin Poland
 
 
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2005;45(3):195-203
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The effect of nine fungicides and chitosan on the viability of Phomopsis viticola Sacc. spores occurring abundantly in pycnidia on carnation leaves, was tested in the laboratory conditions. The chemicals selected represent different mode of action on the pathogen and they were recognized as very effective in limiting P. viticola development within many viticultural regions. Fungicides were tested at six various concentrations of active ingredients, i.e. 10, 50, 100, 200, 500 mg. a.i./cm 3 and at the concentrations that were recommended by the manufacturers. It was found that chlorothalonil, flusilazol and thiophanate – methyl caused the decay of all P. viticola spores in each studied concentration. After using mancozeb, cyprodinil, azoxystrobin and chitosan a strong inhibition of spore viability were also observed, especially at the concentrations of 100 mg of a.i. on cm 3 and above. The other fungicides seem to be less effective compared with the above metioned ones. Basing on the present studies and abundant information from literature, some of the most effective chemicals which should be tested on grapevine plantations in Poland were indicated
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
 
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Baroffio C.A., Siegfried W., Hiber U.W. 2003. Longerm monitoring for resistance of Botryotinia fuckeliana to anilinopyrimidine, phenylpyrrole and hydroxyanilide fungicides in Switzerland. Plant Dis., 87: 662–666.
 
2.
Berezovskaja E.A., Vološina N.P. 1987. Sistema borby sernoj pjatnistostju vinograda. Informacionnyj listok 31: 1–3.
 
3.
Borecki Z. 1984. Fungicydy stosowane w ochronie roślin. PWN, Warszawa, 173 pp.
 
4.
Bourbos V.A., Shourdridakis M.T. 1991. Efficacy of some fungicides against excoriosis of grape. Revue Suisse Vitic. Arboric. Hortic., 23: 197–198.
 
5.
Bugaret Y. 1993. Some facts about folpet. Phytoma 446: 41–42.
 
6.
Castillo-Pando M.S., Nair N.G., Emmett R.W., Wicks T.J. 1997. Inhibition in pycnidial viability of Phomopsis viticola on canes in situ as an aid to reducing inoculum potential of cane and leaf blight disease of grapevines. Australas. Plant Pathol., 26: 21–25.
 
7.
Cavanni P., Fantuz F., Ponti J. 1987. Le malattie crittogarmiche del legno della vite. Informatore Fitopatologico 37, 1: 27–34.
 
8.
Czerniakowski Z.W., Czerniakowski Z. 1999. Nowe środki ochrony roślin. AR im. H. Kołłątaja w Krakowie, WODR- Boguchwała, Rzeszów, 131 pp.
 
9.
Egger E. 2000. Vite: il vecchio e il nuovo su prodotti e strategie di difensa. Informatore Agrario 56: 55–72.
 
10.
Hewitt W.B., Pearson R.C. 1988. Phomopsis cane and leaf spot. pp. 16–18. In “Compendium of Grape Diseases” (R.C. Pearson, A.C. Goheen, eds.). APS Press, Minnesota.
 
11.
Isakovic L. 1999. Quadris – the beginning a new period of vineyards protection. Zbornik predavanj in referatov 4, Slovenskaya Posretovanja o Varstun Rastlin v Portorozu od 3 do 4 Marca 1999: 291–293.
 
12.
Jailloux F., Bugaret Y., Froidefond G. 1987. Inhibition of sporulation of Phomopsis viticola Sacc., cause of dead arm disease of vines, by fosetyl-Al under field conditions. Crop Protection 6: 148–152.
 
13.
Kozar V.M., Berezovskaja E.A. 1980. Nektorye bolezni drevesiny vinogradnych kustov I mery borby s nimi. p. 49–50. In “Povyšenie Effektivnosti Proizvodstva Ulu šenie Kaestva Vinograda i Vina“ (N.P. Vološina, ed.). Novoserkast. Kozar V.M., Berezovskaja E.A. 1988. Porazaemost vinograda ernoj pjatnistostju. Zaš . Rast., 8: 30–31.
 
14.
Kuropatwa E. 1994. Badanie efektywności grzybobójczej fungicydów dla Phomopsis viticola Sacc. powodujacego nekrozę korową winorośli. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sect. EEE – Horticultura 2: 109–115.
 
15.
Latorre B.A., Spadaro J., Rioja M.E. Occurrence of resistant strains of Botrytis cinerea to anilinopyrimidine fungicides in table grapes in Chile. Crop Protection 21: 957–961.
 
16.
Maek J., Zgur J. 1989. Sensitivity of isolates of Phomopsis viticola Sacc., causal agent of grape vine black spot, to some fungicides. Zaštita Bilija 40: 27–33.
 
17.
Machowicz-Stefaniak Z. 1993.Phomopsis viticola Sacc. ( Sphaeropsidales, Deuteromycotina ) nowy w Polsce patogen pędów winorośli. Acta Mycologica XXVIII: 157–160.
 
18.
Machowicz-Stefaniak Z., Kuropatwa E. 1993. Pathogenicity of Phomopsis viticola Sacc. for grape-vine ( Vitis vinifera L.) under foil tunnel conditions. Phytopathol. Pol., 5: 67–72.
 
19.
Merrin S.J., Nair H.G., Tarran J. 1995. Variation in Phomopsis recorded on grapevine in Australia and its taxonomic and biological implications. Australas. Plant Pathol., 24: 44–45.
 
20.
Mostert L., Denman S., Crous P.W. 2000. In vitro screening of fungicides against Phomopsis viticola and Diaporthe perjuncta Enology and Viticulture 21: 62–65.
 
21.
Politi A. 1998. Azoxystrobin (Quadris): fungicide with a wide spectrum of activity for protection of grapevines. Informatore Fitopatologico 48: 36–44.
 
22.
Pospieszny H. 1997. Niektóre aspekty stosowania chitozanu w ochronie roślin. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 37: 306–310.
 
23.
Pospieszny H., Struszczyk H. 1994. Chitozan – potencjalny biopreparat przeciwko patogenom roślin. Materiały 34 Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin, cz. 1: 117–124.
 
24.
Scheper R.W.A., Whisson D.L., Scott E.S. 1997. Revised disease cycles of the two types of Phomopsis on grapevine. Grapegrower and Winemaker 9: 41–44.
 
25.
Schilder A.M.C., Gillett J.M., Sysak R.W., Wise J. 2002. Evaluation of environmentally friendly products for control of fungal diseases of grapes. p. 163–167. In 10th International Conference on Cultivation Technique and Phytopathological Problems in Organic Fruit-Growing and Viticulture. Proc. Conference (Fördergemeinschaft Ökologischer Obstbau e.v., ed.). Weinsberg, Germany, 4–7 February.
 
26.
Schüepp H., Siegfried W. 1988. Auftrefen, Bedeufung und Bekämpfung der Pilzkrankheiten im Rebbou der deutschprachigen Schweiz. Gesunde Pflanzen 40: 286–294.
 
27.
Simon J.L. 1993. Mesures d’hygiene lors du greffage de la vigne. Revue Suisse Vitic. Arboric. Hortic., 25: 63–54.
 
28.
Todorova M., Katerova L. 1995. Infuence of some fungicides on Phomopsis viticola Sacc., the agent of the dead-arm disease of grapevines. I. Influence on the mycelium growth. Rasteniev dni Nauki 32: 211–213.
 
eISSN:1899-007X
ISSN:1427-4345
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top