ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Interaction between beneficial organisms in control of spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Koch.)
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute, Department of Biological Control Władyslawa Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Żaneta Fiedler
Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute, Department of Biological Control Władyslawa Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
 
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2012;52(2):226–229
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Strict regulations limiting the availability of synthetic pesticides on vegetable crops in greenhouses have created a new challenge for plant protection. Many pests such as whiteflies, thrips aphids, spider mites, and other, still remain dangerous and difficult to control on vegetable crops in greenhouses. In the experience of many and in a review of world literature, it has been noted that effective methods of biological control of many pests are already available, or can be easily adapted for practice. According to the Polish Directives, biological methods should be used prior to any application of chemical products. Thus, biological control is a priority in plant protection, especially for vegetable crops in greenhouses. Tetranychus urticae is the most important pest in greenhouse crops. Successful control of this pest is very difficult. In laboratory studies the predator mites Amblyseius swirskii and Phytoseiulus persimilis showed a high efficacy when used together to control of two-spotted spider mites (86% mortality). When predators were used separately they were less effective against the pest (about 63% mortality). The studies showed that A. swirskii was competitive with P. persimilis populations for controlling the two-spotted spider mite. Other predators mites: Amblyseius degenerans and Amblyseius californicus used in the experiments demonstrated neutral interaction.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
 
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Barber A., Campbell C.A.M., Crane H., Lilley R., Tregidga E. 2003. Biocontrol of two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on Phytoseiid mites Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neo-seiulus californicus.Bioc. Sci. and Technol. 13 (3): 123–141.
 
2.
Bednarek A., Goszczyński W. 2002. The cost of biological pest control in protected tomato crops. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 25 (1): 5–8.
 
3.
Chesson P., Kuang J.J. 2008. The interaction between predation and competition. Nature 456: 235–238.
 
4.
Dąbrowski Z.T. 2000. Konieczność zmian metod w opracowywaniu i wdrażaniu integrowanych metod ochrony roślin. [Necessary changes in the methodology of development and implementation of integrated pest management]. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 40 (1): 334–342.
 
5.
Dabrowski Z.T., Kropczyńska-Linkiewicz D. 2001. System wspomagań decyzji w różnych systemach ochrony roślin. Metodyka podejmowania decyzji w różnych systemach ochrony roślin. Pam. Puł. – Mat. Konf. 124: 25–35.
 
6.
Dicke M. 2007. The role of microorganisms In tr-trophic interactions In system consisting of plants, herbivores and carnivores. Biomedic. Life Sci. 9: 71–84.
 
7.
Fiedler Z. 2006. Nowości w dziedzinie biologicznego zwalczania szkodników w szklarniach. Ogrodnik Polski 2 (29): 45–47.
 
8.
Kogan M. 1998. Integrated pest management: historical perspectives and contemporary developments. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 43: 243–270.
 
9.
Lenteren Joop C. van. 2007. Biological control for insect pests in greenhouses: an unexpected succes. In: “Biological Control a global perpective” (Vincent, Goettel, Lazarovits, eds.). CAB International, 440 pp.
 
10.
Lipa J.J. 2000. Integrowanie metod ochrony roślin. Ochrona Roślin 8: 12–14.
 
11.
Program Ochrony Warzyw na 2002. Owoce Warzywa Kwiaty. 1–2, Hortpress, Warszawa, 88 pp.
 
12.
Program Ochrony Warzyw na 2010. Owoce Warzywa Kwiaty. 1–2, Hortpress, Warszawa, 146 pp.
 
13.
Prosper J.I. 2007. Microorganisms, macroorganisms and ekology. Microbiol. Ecol. 62: 133–134.
 
14.
Tomalak M. 2007. Rejestracja biologicznych środków ochrony roślin w Europie – nowe perspektywy. [Registration of biological agents of plant protection in europe – new perspectives]. Prog. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roślin 47 (4): 233–240.
 
15.
Wiliams M.E.D.C. 2001. Biological control of thrips on ornamental crops: Interactions between predatory mite Neoseilus cucumeris (Acari: Phytosiedae) and western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae., on cyclamen. Bioc. Sci. Techol. 11 (1): 28–44.
 
16.
Wright D.J.R., Verkerk R.H.J. 2006. Integration of chemical and biological control systems for arthropods: Evaluation in multitrophic context. Pest Manage. Sci. 44 (3): 207–218.
 
eISSN:1899-007X
ISSN:1427-4345