ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Mortality of the nut-leaf weevil Strophosoma melanogrammum (Forster) and damage rate of needles after treatment with entomopathogenic fungi
 
More details
Hide details
1
Centre for Ecological Research, Polish Academy of Science Dziekanów Leśny, Konopnickiej 1, 05-092 Łomianki, Poland Present address: Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Institute of Ecology and Bioethics, The Faculty of Christian Philosophy, Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Anna Augustyniuk-Kram
Centre for Ecological Research, Polish Academy of Science Dziekanów Leśny, Konopnickiej 1, 05-092 Łomianki, Poland
 
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2010;50(4):545–550
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The susceptibility of the nut-leaf weevil, Strophosoma melanogrammum (Forster)(Coleoptera; Curculionidae) to the selected strains of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuillemin, Isaria farinosa (Holm) Brown & Smith, I. fumosorosea (Wize) Brown & Smith, Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin and M. flavoviride Gams & Rozsypal, was tested under laboratory conditions. Two ways of insect exposure to fungus were studied; direct inoculation of weevils and indirect by contact with inoculated A. procera twigs that served as food for S. melanogrammum. All of the tested isolates were pathogenic to S. melanogrammum. Direct inoculation of adult weevils in fungal spore suspensions resulted in the greatest mortality compared to indirect inoculation where A. procera twigs were immersed in spore suspensions. Direct inoculation with B. bassiana and Metarhizium spp. isolates caused over 80% mortality after 28 days at 20°C, while LT 50 values ranged from 15.0 to 21.6 days. Indirect inoculation with the most effective isolate M. anisopliae (275) resulted in 72% mortality after 28 days with a LT 50 value of 22.1 days. Both direct and indirect spore application failed to reduce needle damage compared with the control. However, significant differences between particular isolates have appeared.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
 
REFERENCES (33)
1.
Amiri B., Ibrahim L. Butt T.M. 1999. Antifeedant properties of destruxins and their use with the entomogenous fungus Metarhizium anisopliae for improved control of crucifer pests. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 9 (4): 487–498.
 
2.
Bandani A.R., Butt T.M. 1999. Insecticidal, antifeedant, growth inhibitory activities ofefrapeptins, metabolities of the entomogenous fungus Tolypocladium. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 9 (4): 499–506.
 
3.
Brousseau C., Charpentier G. Belloncik S. 1996. Susceptibility of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana Clemens, to destruxins, cyclodepsipeptidic mycotoxins of Metarhizium anisopliae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 68 (2): 180–182.
 
4.
Burges H.D. 1998. Formulation of mycoinsecticides. p. 131–185. In: “Formulation of Microbial Biopesticides” (H.D. Burges, ed.). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 399 pp.
 
5.
Butt T.M., Harris J.G., Powell K.A. 1999. Microbial Biopesticides. p. 23–44. In: “Methods in Biotechnology” (F.R. Hall, J.J. Menn, eds.). Humana Press, Totowa, 630 pp.
 
6.
Eilenberg J., Vestergaard S. Harding S., Nielsen C. 2000. Potential for microbial control of Scarabaeidae and Curculionidae in Christmas tree and greenery production. p. 22–23. In: ”Improvements in Christmas Tree and Greenery Quality” (C.J. Christensen, ed.). Ministry of Environment, Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute – Reports No. 7, 124 pp.
 
7.
Frølander A., Harding S. 2000. Strophosoma spp. in Abies Christmas tree and greenery production – factors influencing weevils abundance and damage levels. p. 24–25. In: “Improvements in Christmas Tree and Greenery Quality” (C.J. Christensen, ed.). Ministry of Environment, Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute – Reports No. 7, 124 pp.
 
8.
Gams W., Hodge K.T., Samson R.A., Korf R.P., Seifert K.A. 2005. Proposal to conserve the name Isaria (anamorphic fungi) with a conserved type. Taxon 54 (2): 537.
 
9.
Gams W., Zare R.A. 2001. A revision of Verticillium sect. Prostrata. III. Generic classification. Nova Hedwigia 72 (3–4): 329–337.
 
10.
Goettel M.S., Inglis G.D. 1997. Fungi: Hyphomycetes. p. 221–224. In: “Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology” (L.A. Lacey, ed.). Academic Press, New York, 409 pp.
 
11.
Hajek A.E. 1997. Ecology of terrestrial fungal entomopathogens. p.193–247. In “Advances in Microbial Ecology” Vol. 15 (J.G. Jones, ed.). Plenum Press New York and London, 374 pp.
 
12.
Ignoffo C.M., Garcia C., Kroha M. 1983. A leaf surface treatment bioassay for determining the activity of conidia of Beauveria bassiana against Leptinotarsa decemlineata. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 41 (3): 385–386.
 
13.
Keller S., Schweizer C., Keller E., Brenner H. 1997. Control of white grubs (Melolontha melolontha L.) by treating adults with the fungus Beauveria brongniartii. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 7 (1): 105–116.
 
14.
Keller S., Zimmermann G. 1989. Mycopathogens of soil insects. p. 263–264. In: “Insect – fungus interactions” (N. Wilging, N.M. Collins, P.M. Hammond, J.F. Webber, eds.). Academic Press, London, 344 pp.
 
15.
Kolk A., Starzyk J.R. 1996. Atlas szkodliwych owadów leśnych. Multico, Warszawa, 706 pp.
 
16.
Latch G.C.M. 1976. Studies on the susceptibility of Oryctes rhinoceros to some entomogenous fungi. Entomophaga 21 (1): 31–38.
 
17.
Mohamed A.K.A. 1982. Pathogenicity of Nomuraea rileyi and its effect of food consumption and utilization by Heliothis virescens larvae. J. Georgia Entomol. Soc.17: 369–376.
 
18.
Moore D., Reed M., Le Patourel G., Abraham Y.G., Prior C. 1992. Reduction of feeding by the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, after infection with Metarhizium flavoviride. J. Insect Pathol. 60 (3): 304–307.
 
19.
Moorhouse E.R., Gillespie A.T., Charnley A.K. 1993. Selection of virulent and persistent Metarhizium anisopliae isolates to control black vine weevil (Otiorhynchus sulcatus) larvae on glasshouse begonia. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 62 (1): 47–52.
 
20.
Nielsen C., Vestergaard S., Harding S., Wolsted C., Eilenberg J. 2006. Biological control of Strophosoma spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in greenery (Abies procera) plantations using Hyphomycetes. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 16 (6): 583–598.
 
21.
Noma T., Strickler K. 2000. Effect of Beauveria bassiana on Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera:Miridae) feeding and oviposition. Environ. Entomol. 29 (2): 394–402.
 
22.
Poprawski T.J., Marchal M., Robert P.H. 1985. Comparative susceptibility of Otiorhynchus sulcatus and Sitonia lineatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) early stages to five entomopathogenic Hyphomycetes. Environ. Entomol. 14 (3): 247–253.
 
23.
Quesada-Moraga E., Navas-Cortes J.A., Maranhao E.A.A., Ortiz-Urquiza A., Santiago-Alvarez C. 2007. Factors affecting the occurrence and distribution of entomopathogenic fungi in natural and cultivated soils. Mycol. Res. 111 (8): 947–966.
 
24.
Roberts D.W. 1981. Toxins of entomopathogenic fungi. p. 441–464. In: “Microbial Control of Pests and Plant Disease” (H.D. Burges, ed.). Academic Press, New York, 949 pp.
 
25.
Roberts D.W., Humber R.A. 1981. Entomogenous fungi. p. 201–237. In: “Biology of Conidial Fungi” (I.T. Cole, B. Kendrick, eds.). Academic Press, New York, 486 pp.
 
26.
Robertson J.L., Preisler H.K. 1992. Pesticide Bioassays with Arthropods. CRC Press, London. 199 pp.
 
27.
SAS Institute Inc. 1990. SAS/STAT User’s guide, version 6, 4th ed. Vol. 1–2. Cary, North Carolina.
 
28.
Steenberg T., Humber R.A. 1999. Entomopathogenic potential of Verticillium and Acremonium species (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes). J. Inverterb. Pathol. 73 (3): 309–314.
 
29.
Tefera T., Pringle K.L. 2003. Food consumption by Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae infected with Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae and effects of feeding natural versus artificial diets on mortality and mycosis. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 84 (3): 220–225.
 
30.
Throne J.E., Weaver D.K., Chew V., Baker J.E. 1995. Probit analysis of correlated data: multiple observations over time at one concentration. J. Econ. Entomol. 88 (5): 1510–1512.
 
31.
Vänninen I. 1995. Distribution and occurrence of four entomopathogenic fungi in Finland: effect of geographical location, habitat type and soil type. Mycol. Res. 100 (1): 93–101.
 
32.
Vestergaard S., Eilenberg J., Harding S. 2000. Potential for microbial control of scarabs and weevils in Danish forestry. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 23 (8): 35–37.
 
33.
Vestergaard S., Eilenberg J., Nielsen C. Harding S. 2001. Microbial control of scarabs and weevils in Christmas trees and greenery. In: 34th Annual Meeting, Society for Invertebrate Pathology, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. 25–30 August 2001, p. 81.
 
eISSN:1899-007X
ISSN:1427-4345