Current Issue
First Look
Ahead of Print
Archive
About the Journal
List of Reviewers
4/2013 vol. 53
Stats
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Get citation
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Practical and economic efficacy of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. surveillance in compliance with the international standards
Iryna M. Podberezko 1
,
 
Liliya A. Pylypenko 2
,
 
Valentyna Ya. Mar’uschkina 2
,
 
Oleksandr I. Borzykh 2
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute for Potato Research of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of the Ukraine, 22 Chkalova Street, Nemischaeve, 07853, Ukraine
 
2
Institute of Plant Protection of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of the Ukraine, 33 Vasylkivska Street, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine
 
 
Submission date: 2013-03-10
 
 
Acceptance date: 2013-10-16
 
 
Corresponding author
Liliya A. Pylypenko
Institute of Plant Protection of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of the Ukraine, 33 Vasylkivska Street, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine
 
 
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2013;53(4):392-398
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jppr-2013-0058
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (18)
 
KEYWORDS
common ragweed
distribution
infested area
International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM)
invasive alien species
surveillance
 
TOPICS
Weeds Science
 
ABSTRACT
Ambrosia artemisiifolia distribution in the Ukraine for the 1973–2013 period was analyzed. The infested areas were consequently grouped into 6 categories. Intense infestation in the region was the reason for the analysis and the categorization. A practical approach to the A. artemisiifolia surveillance system which complied with the International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures concerning “a pest free area”, “pest free places of production”, “pest free production sites” and “an area of low pest prevalence” was recommended. This action should drive the policy-making process to underpin national legislation regarding invasive species. The opportunity also presents itself for improved communications with growers and stakeholders because of the more transparent and cost effective system of A. artemisiifolia surveillance offered. There would be a chance to slow down the A. artemisiifolia invasion even though this invasive species has already occupied 3.6 million hectares.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
 
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Bullock J.M., Chapman D., Schafer S., Roy D., Haynes T., Beal S., Wheeler B., Dickie I., Phang Z., Tinch R., Čivić K., Delbaere B., Jones-Walters L., Hilbert A., Schrauwen A., Girardello M., Prank M., Sofiev M., Niemelä S., Räisänen P., Lees B., Skinner M., Finch S., Brough C. 2010. Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe. Final report: ENV.B2/ETU/2010/0037. https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/d... [Accessed: March, 2013].
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Burda P.I., Tokhar V.K. 1988. Загроза біологічного забруднення північноамериканськими видами. [The threat of biological pollution by North American species in Ukraine]. Ukrainian Botanical Journal 55: 127–130 (In Ukrainian).
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Burgiel S., Foote G., Orellana M., Perrault A. 2006. Invasive Alien Species and Trade: Integrating Prevention Measures and International Trade Rules. Center for International Environmental Law, Defenders of Wildlife, The Nature Conservancy, Global Invasive Species Initiative. http://cleantrade.typepad.com/... [Accessed: March, 2013].
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Chapman A. 2013. SWOT analysis [online]. www.businessballs.com/swotanalysisfreetemplate.htm [Accessed: March, 2013].
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Hulme P.E. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 46 (1): 10–18.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
ISPM 1. 2006. Phytosanitary principles for the protection of plants and the application of phytosanitary measures in international trade [online]. Rome, IPPC, FAO. www.ippc.int/index.php?id=ispms&no_cache=1&L=0 [Accessed: March, 2013].
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
ISPM 4. 1995. Requirements for the establishment of pest free areas [online]. Rome, IPPC, FAO. www.ippc.int/index.php?id=ispms&no_cache= 1&L=0 [Accessed: March, 2013].
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
ISPM 10. 1999. Requirements for the establishment of pest free places of production and pest free production sites [online]. Rome, IPPC, FAO. www.ippc.int/index.php?id=ispms&no_cache=1&L=0 [Accessed: March, 2013].
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
ISPM 22. 2005. Requirements for the establishment of areas of low pest prevalence [online]. Rome, IPPC, FAO. www.ippc.int/index.php?id= ispms&no_cache=1&L=0 [Accessed: March, 2013].
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
ISPM 29. 2007. Recognition of pest free areas and areas of low pest prevalence [online]. Rome, IPPC, FAO. www.ippc.int/index.php?id= ispms&no_cache=1&L=0 [Accessed: March, 2013].
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Kabeil S.S., Lashin S.M., El-Masry M.H., El-Saadani M.A., Abd-Elgawad M.M., Aboul-Einean A.M. 2008. Potato Brown Rot Disease in Egypt: Current Status and Prospects. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci. 4 (1): 44–54.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Mar’uschkina V.Y. 1986. Амброзия полыннолистная и основы биологической борьбы с ней [Common ragweed and its biological control.]. Naukova dumka, Kyiv, Ukraina, 117 pp. (In Russian).
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Mar’uschkina V., Podberezko I. 2008. Моніторинг амброзії полинолистої: екологічні аспекти [Ecological aspects of common ragweed surveillance]. Quarantine and Plant Protection 5: 18–25 (In Ukrainian).
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Protopopova V.V. 1973. Адвентивні рослини Лісостепу і Степу України [Adventive plant species in Forest steppe and Steppe zones of Ukraine] Naukova dumka, Kyiv, Ukraina, 191 pp. (In Ukrainian).
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Sotnikov V.V., Zuza V.S., Bahtiarova E.T. 2006. Амброзія полинолиста – небезпечна карантинна рослина [Common ragweed – dangerous quarantine plant]. Kharkiv, Ukraina, 64 pp. (In Ukrainian).
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Review on quarantine pests, diseases and weeds distribution in Ukraine. 2013. State Plant Quarantine Inspection of Ukraine. http://golovderzhkarantyn.gov.... (In Russian). [Accessed: March, 2013].
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
[The Law of Ukraine on Plant Quarantine]. Закон України „Про карантин рослин” 2006. Kyiv, Ukraina, 36 pp. (In Ukrainian).
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
White B., Sadler R., Florec V., Dominiak B. 2012. Economics of Surveillance: a Bioeconomic Assessment of Queensland Fruit Fly. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bi... [Accessed: March, 2013].
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
The stink bug, Andrallus spinidens (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), a potential predator for effective biological control
The influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation on the potential distribution areas of Bursaphelencus xylophilus in Europe based on climatological reanalysis data
Spatio-temporal risk assessment models for Lobesia botrana in uncolonized winegrowing areas
Some evidence for skewed mating type distribution in Iranian populations of Rhynchosporium commune, the cause of barley scald disease
Two torymid species (Hym.: Chalcidoidea, Torymidae) developing on Artemisia gall midges (Dip.: Cecidomyiidae)
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:1899-007X
ISSN:1427-4345
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top