ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Transmission properties of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus from Tanzania
| 1 | Department of Crop Protection, Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University
P.M.B. 1044, Zaria, Nigeria |
| 2 | Department of Crop Science and Production, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania |
| 3 | Agricultural Research Institute, Mikocheni, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Boniface D. Kashina
Department of Crop Protection, Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University P.M.B. 1044, Zaria, Nigeria
Department of Crop Protection, Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University P.M.B. 1044, Zaria, Nigeria
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2007;47(1):43–51
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The tomato yellow leaf curl virus infecting tomato plants in Tanzania is reported to be different from the Old World geminiviruses. A study was initiated to investigate the transmission properties of the virus such as, acquisition feeding time, inoculation feeding time, persistence of virus in the vector, mechanical inoculation, seed and graft transmission. Results obtained indicate that the virus is transmitted persistently by Bemisia tabaci Genn., but neither mechanically – nor seed-transmissible. Minimum acquisition and inoculation time was 30 minutes. It is concluded that the properties of the agent causing the yellow leaf curl symptoms in tomato plants from different regions of Tanzania are similar and mimic those of tomato yellow leaf curl
Begomovirus species studied elsewhere.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Abdel-Salam A.M. 1990. Mechanical transmission of two Egyptian isolates of Beet curly top and Tomato yellow leaf curl viruses. Bull. Fac. Agric. Univ. Cairo 41: 825–842.
2.
Al-Musa A. 1992. Incidence, economic importance and control of Tomato yellow leaf curl in Jordan. Plant Dis. 66: 561–563.
3.
Antignus Y., Perslam M., Ben-Joseph R., Cohen S. 1994. Association of the nucleic acid and coat protein of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) with the whitefly vector, Bemisia tabaci. p. 66. In: “First International Symposium on Geminiviruses”. 14–17, September, 1994, El Ejido, Almeria Spain. Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca, Junta de Andalucia, Universidad de Malaga, Spain.
4.
AVRDC 1994. Tomato diseases in Tanzania: Identification, disease incidence and distribution. Annu. Prog. Rep.: 478–482.
5.
Brown J.K., Nelson M.R. 1988. Transmission, host range and virus-vector relationships of chino del tomate virus, a whitefly-transmitted geminivirus from Sinaloa, Mexico. Plant Dis. 72: 866–869.
6.
Cherif C., Russo M. 1983. Cytological evidence of the association of a geminivirus with the Tomato yellow leaf curl disease in Tunisia. Phytopathol. Z. 108: 221–225.
7.
Chiang B.T., Nakhla M.K., Maxwell D.P., Schoenfelder M., Green S.K. 1997. A new geminivirus associated with a leaf curl disease of tomato in Tanzania Plant Dis. 81, p. 111.
8.
Cohen S., Nitzany F.E. 1966. Transmission and host range of the tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Phytopathology 56: 1127–1131.
9.
D’Hondt M., Russo M. 1985. Tomato yellow leaf curl in Senegal. Phytopathol. Z. 112: 153–160.
10.
Friedmann M., Lapidot M., Cohen S., Pilowsky M. 1998. A novel source of resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus exhibiting a symptomless reaction to viral infection. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 123: 1004–1007.
11.
Gibbs A.J., Gower J.C. 1960. The use of a multiple-transfer method in plant virus transmission studies-some statistical points arising in the analysis of results. Ann. Appl. Biol. 48: 75–83.
12.
Kashina B.D., Mabagala R.B. Mpunami A.A. 2003. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease in Tanzania: Status and strategies for sustainable management. J. Sustainable Agric. 22 (2): 23–41.
13.
Ioannou N. 1985. Yellow leaf curl and other virus diseases of tomato in Cyprus. Plant Pathol. 34: 428–434.
14.
Makkouk K.M., Shehab S., Majdalani S.E. 1979. Tomato yellow leaf curl: incidence, yield losses and transmission in Lebanon. Phytopathol. Z. 96: 263–267.
15.
Makkouk K.M., Latterot H. 1983. Epidemiology and control of tomato yellow leaf curl virus. p. 321. In: “Plant Virus Epidemiology” (R.T. Plumb, J.M. Thresh, eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd., Oxford, UK.
16.
Mansour A., Al-Musa A. 1992. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus: host range and virus-vector relationships. Plant Pathol. 41: 122–125.
17.
Nono-Womdim R., Swai I.S., Green S.K., Gebre-Selassie K., Latterot H., Marchoux G., Opena R.T. 1996. Tomato viruses in Tanzania: Identification, distribution and disease incidence. J. South African Soc. Hortic. Sci. 6 (1): 41–44.
18.
Pico B., Diez M.J., Nuez F. 1996. Viral diseases causing the greatest economic losses to the tomato crop. II. The tomato yellow leaf curl virus-a review. Sci. Hortic. 67: 151–196.
19.
Rom M., Antignus Y., Gidoni D., Pilowsky M., Cohen S. 1993. Accumulation of tomato yellow leaf curl virus DNA in tolerant and susceptible tomato lines. Plant Dis. 77: 253–257.
20.
Rubinstein G., Czosnek H. 1997. Long-term association of tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) with its whitefly vector Bemisia tabaci: Effect on the insect transmission capacity, longevity and fecundity. J. Gen. Virol. 78: 2683–2689.
21.
Wege Ch., Saunders K., Stanley J. Jeske H. 1994. Phloem-limitation is a characteristic of some, but not all geminiviruses with a bipartite genome. p. 63. In: “First International Symposium on Geminiviruses”. 14–17, September, 1994, El-Ejido, Almeria, Spain. Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca, Junta de Andalucia, Universaidad de Malaga, Spain.
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.