Model based decision support system of operating settings for MMAT nozzles
More details
Hide details
USDA-ARS-Aerial Application Technology Research Unit, 3103 F&B Road, College Station, TX 77845, USA
Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
Submission date: 2016-02-26
Acceptance date: 2016-06-10
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2016;56(2):178–185
Droplet size, which is affected by nozzle type, nozzle setups and operation, and spray solution, is one of the most critical factors influencing spray performance, environment pollution, food safety, and must be considered as part of any application scenario. Characterizing spray nozzles can be a timely and expensive proposition if the entire operational space (all combinations of spray pressure and orifice size, what influence flow rate) is to be evaluated. This research proposes a structured, experimental design that allows for the development of computational models for droplet size based on any combination of a nozzle’s potential operational settings. The developed droplet size determination model can be used as Decision Support System (DSS) for precise selection of sprayer working parameters to adapt to local field scenarios. Five nozzle types (designs) were evaluated across their complete range of orifice size (flow rate*) and spray pressures using a response surface experimental design. Several of the models showed high level fits of the modeled to the measured data while several did not as a result of the lack of significant effect from either orifice size (flow rate*) or spray pressure. The computational models were integrated into a spreadsheet based user interface for ease of use. The proposed experimental design provides for efficient nozzle evaluations and development of computational models that allow for the determination of droplet size spectrum and spraying classification for any combination of a given nozzle’s operating settings. The proposed DSS will allow for the ready assessment and modification of a sprayers performance based on the operational settings, to ensure the application is made following recommendations in plant protection products (PPP) labels.
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
Zbigniew Czaczyk
Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
1. ANSI/ASAE S572.1. 2009. Spray Nozzle Classification by Drop Spectra. The American Society of Agricultural Engineers, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) Standards, St. Joseph, MI, USA, 4 pp.
2. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) 2012. Terminology and Definitions for Agricultural Chemical Application. ASABE Standards S327.3 (R2012), St. Joseph, MI, USA, 6 pp.
3. Czaczyk Z. 2012a. Spray classification for selected flat fan nozzles. Journal of Plant Protection Research 52 (1): 180–183.
4. Czaczyk Z. 2012b. Working characteristics of selected flat fan nozzles for protection of field crops. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 57 (2): 31–40. Available on: http://www.pimr.poznan.pl/biul... [Accessed: November 11, 2015].
5. Czaczyk Z. 2013. Jakość rozpylenia cieczy jako element doradczy decydujący o efektywności i bezpieczeństwie ochrony roślin. [Spraying characteristics as advising factor, influenced effectiveness and safety of plant protection]. Zagadnienia Doradztwa Rolniczego 71 (1): 30–44.
6. Czaczyk Z., Fritz B.K., Hoffmann W.C. 2014. Problems with determination of spraying characteristics (a review). Aspects of Applied Biology 122, International Advances in Pesticide Application: 405–410.
7. Czaczyk Z., Gnusowski B. 2007. Comparison of fungicide residues in apple flesh depending on spraying categories. Annales of the University of Craiova XXXVII(A): 554–557.
8. Czaczyk Z., Szulc T. 2012. Working and production characteristics of selected flat fan nozzles. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 57 (2): 52–59.
9. Doble S.J., Matthews G.A., Rutherford I., Southcombe E.S.E. 1985. A System for Classifying Hydraulic Nozzles and Other Atomizers into Categories of Spray Quality. p. 1125–1133. In: British Crop Protection Conference Weeds 9A-5, Brighton Metropole, UK, 18–21 November 1985, 1300 pp.
10. Dodge L.G. 1987. Comparison of performance of drop-sizing instruments. Applied Optics 26 (7): 1328–1341.
11. Dorr G.J., Hewitt A.J., Adkins S.W., Hanan J., Zhang H., Noller B. 2013. A comparison of initial spray characteristics produced by agricultural nozzles. Crop Protection 53: 109–117.
12. Douzals J.P. 2012. Asymmetric classification of drift reducing nozzles considering frontal or lateral wind conditions. Proceedings of CIGR – Agiculture and Engineering Meeting, Valencia, Spain, 8–12 July 2012, 4 pp.
13. Fritz B.K., Hoffmann W.C., Bagley W.E., Kruger G.R., Czaczyk Z., Henry R.S. 2014a. Measuring droplet size of agricultural spray nozzles – measurement distance and airspeed effects. Atomization Sprays 24 (9): 747–760.
14. Fritz B.K., Hoffmann W.C., Czaczyk Z., Bagley W., Kruger G., Henry R. 2012. Measurement and classification methods using the ASAE S572.1 reference nozzles. Journal of Plant Protection Research 52 (4): 452–462.
15. Fritz B.K., Hoffmann W.C., Kruger G.R., Henry R.S., Hewitt A., Czaczyk Z. 2014b. Comparison of drop size data from ground and aerial application nozzles at three testing laboratories. Atomization Sprays 24 (2): 181–192.
16. Fritz B.K., Hoffman W.C., Anderson J. 2016. Response surface method for evaluation of the performance of agricultural application spray nozzles. p. 61–76. In: “Pesticide Formulation and Delivery Systems.” Vol. 35. (G.R. Goss, ed.). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. DOI: 10.1520/STP158720140100.
17. Gajtkowski A. 1985. Dobór parametrów pracy rozpylaczy i opryskiwaczy polowych. [Investigations and selection of operations parameters for sprayers used in field spraying]. Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu, Rozprawy Naukowe 151, 95 pp. (in Polish).
18. Giles D.K., Downey D., Squire L. 2005. Transient droplet size spectra from trigger sprayers dispensing aqueous solutions. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASAE) 48 (1): 63–72.
19. Hammond D.C. Jr. 1981. Deconvolution technique for line-of-sight optical scattering measurements in axisymmetric sprays. Applied Optics 20 (3): 493–499.
20. Hewitt A.J. 1997a. Droplet size and agricultural spraying, Part 1: Atomization, spray transport, deposition, drift and droplet size measurement techniques. Atomization Sprays 7 (3): 235–244.
21. Hewitt A.J. 1997b. Spray drift task force study No. A95-010, Miscellaneous Nozzle Study, EPA MRID No. 44310401.ISO 10625. 2005. Equipment for Crop Protection. Sprayer Nozzles. Colour Coding for Identification. International Organization for Standardization, 12 pp.
22. ISO 8169. 1984. Equipment for Crop Protection – Sprayers – Connecting Dimensions for Nozzles and Manometers. International Organization for Standardization, 3 pp.
23. Kirk I.W. 2007. Measurement and Prediction of Atomization Parameters from Fixed-wing Aircraft Spray Nozzles. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) 50 (3): 693–703.
24. Matthews G.A. 2000. Pesticide Application Methods. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 448 pp.
25. Miller P.C.H., Tuck C.R. 2005. Factors Influencing the Performance of Spray Delivery Systems: A Review of Recent Developments. Journal of ASTM International 2 (6): 1–13.
26. Tishkoff J.M. 1984. Spray characterization: Practices and requirements. Optical Engineering 23 (5): 557–560.