ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Application of reduced doses of chlorsulfuron in semi-dwarf and full-height cultivars of winter triticale
1
Weed Science and Plant Protection Techniques Department, Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute, Władysława
Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Submission date: 2014-07-21
Acceptance date: 2015-01-22
Corresponding author
Sylwia Kaczmarek
Weed Science and Plant Protection Techniques Department, Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Weed Science and Plant Protection Techniques Department, Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2015;55(1):8-15
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the field experiments carried out in the years 2009–2011 was to assess the application of reduced doses of chlorsulfuron on yield and quality parameters of winter triticale semi-dwarf and full-height cultivars. The herbicide effect was evaluated
in two cultivars, Grenado and Pizarro. The cultivars were of different plant heights. Chlorsulfuron was applied at the recommended
dose (15 g a.i. ∙ ha–1), at areduced dose (10.5 g a.i. ∙ ha–1) and at areduced dose with an adjuvant. Treatments with the herbicide were
conducted directly after the triticale had been sown. Visual assessment of weed infestation was carried out in spring, after the start
of the vegetation of the cultivated plant. The study assessed triticale grain yield, grain number per ear, thousand grain weight, and
selected qualitative parameters of grain (protein and starch content). The obtained data proved the usefulness of reduced doses of
chlorsulfuron in weed control both separately and in a combination with the adjuvant. The average percent of the weed control was
very high for both cultivars and for the assessed doses of herbicide. Both experimental factors (herbicide dose and triticale cultivar)
influenced the level of the obtained grain yield of triticale, and the thousand kernel weight. While grain number per ear and protein
and starch content depended only on the examined cultivar.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (45)
1.
Arseniuk E., Oleksiak T. 2004. Triticale in Poland. p. 131–135. In: “Triticale Improvement and Production” (M. Mergoum, H.Gomez-Macpherson, eds.).Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nation, Rome, 2004, 154 pp.
2.
Bailey W.A., Wilson H.P., Brann D.E., Griffey C.A. 2004. Wheat cultivar tolerance to AE F130060 03. Weed Technology 18 (4): 881–886.
3.
Barnett R.D., Blount A.R., Pfahler P.L., Bruckner P.L., Wesenberg D.M., Johnson J.W. 2006. Environmental stability and heritability estimates for grain yield and test weight in triticale. Journal of Applied Genetics 47 (3): 207–213.
4.
Barros J.F.C., Basch G., Freixial R., Carvalho M. 2009. Effect of reduced doses of mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron to control weeds in no-till wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 7 (4): 905–912.
5.
Barros J.C., Basch G., Calado J.G., Carvalho M. 2011. Reduced doses of herbicides to control weeds in barley crops under temperate climate conditions. Revista Brasileira Ciências Agrárias Recife 6 (2): 197–202.
6.
Brzozowska I., Brzozowski J. 2011. Effectivenes of weed control and the yield of winter triticale depending on the tending method and nitrogen fertilization. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura 10 (4): 25–33.
7.
Buczek J., Szpunar-Krok E., Tobiasz-Salach R., Bobrecka-Jamro D. 2012. Influence of sowing density and dose tribenuronmetyl on weed infestation in spring wheat. Progress of Plant Protection/Postępy w Ochronie Roślin 52 (1): 62–66. (in Polish with English summary).
8.
Christensen S. 1994. Crop weed competition and herbicide performance in cereal species and varieties. Weed Research 34 (1): 29–36.
9.
Cousens R.D., Mokhtari S. 1998. Sesonal and site variability in the tolerance of wheat cultivars to interference from Lolium rigidum. Weed Research 38 (4): 301–307.
10.
Darvey N.L., Gustafson J.P., Naeem H. 2000. Triticale: Production and Utilization. p. 257–274. In: “Handbook of Cereal Science and Technology” (K. Kulp, J.G. Ponte, eds.), Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, 808 pp.
11.
Didon U.M.E. 2002. Variation between cultivars in early response to weed competition. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 188 (3): 176–184.
12.
Erekul O., Köhn W. 2006. Effect of weather and soil conditions on yield components and bread-making quality of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and winter triticale (Triticosecale Wittm.) varieties in north-east Germany. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 192 (6): 452–464.
13.
Fathi G. 2005. Integrated weed management in canola. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 10 (2): 57–63.
14.
Główny Urząd Statystyczny 2014. Charakterystyka gospodarstw rolnych w 2013 r. [Characteristic of farms in 2013]. http://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tem.... [Accessed: June 20, 2014]. (in Polish).
15.
Główny Urząd Statystyczny 2012. Powszechny Spis Rolny 2010 – Uprawy rolne i wybrane elementy metod produkcji roślinnej. [Agricultural Census 2010 – Crop and selected elements of crop production methods]. http://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tem.... [Accessed: June 20, 2014]. (in Polish).
16.
Hassan G., Tanveer S., Khan N.U., Munir M. 2010. Integrating cultivars with reduced herbicide rates for weed management in maize. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42 (3): 1923–1929.
17.
Javaid M.M., Tanveer A., Ahmad R., Yaseen M., Khaliq A. 2012.Optimizing activity of herbicides at reduced rate on Emex spinosa campd. with adjuvants. Planta Daninha 30 (2): 425–435.
18.
Kaczmarek S., Kierzek R., Gruchot D. 2009. Winter wheat response to application of reduced doses of fluroxypyr + 2,4 D. Bulletin of Institute of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization 254: 13–20.
19.
Kieloch R., Domaradzki K. 2011. The role of the growth stage of weeds in their response to reduced herbicide doses. Acta Agrobotanica 64 (4): 259–266.
20.
Kraska P. 2008. The influence of different herbicide doses on weed infestation of winter triticale cultivated in monoculture. Acta Agrobotanica 61 (2): 229–238.
21.
Kurowski T.P., Brzozowska I., Brzozowski J. 2004. The effect of application of different herbicides and herbicides combined with urea on the sanitary state of winter triticale. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio E, 59 (3): 1267–1274.
22.
Kurowski T.P., Brzozowska I., Brzozowski J., Kurowska A. 2010. Health status of winter triticale as dependent on weed control, nitrogen fertilization and protection against pathogens. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio E, 65 (2): 10–21.
23.
Kwiatkowski C., Wesołowski M., Juszczak J. 2011. Effect of adjuvants and reduced doses of pesticides on nutrient composition of spring barley grain. Acta Agrophysica 17 (2): 345–357.
24.
Kwiecińska-Poppe E., Kraska P., Andruszczak S., Pałys E. 2010. Yield and some grain quality characteristics of winter triticosecale cultivated in monoculture in conditions of application of different herbicide doses and foliar fertilization Progress of Plant Protection/Postępy w Ochronie Roślin 50 (2): 999–1003. (in Polish with English summary).
25.
Lanning S.P., Talbert L.E., Martin J.N., Blake T.K., Bruckner P.L. 1997. Genotype of wheat and barley affects light penetration and wild oat growth. Agronomy Journal 89 (1): 100–103.
26.
Lemerle D., Verbeck B., Orchard B. 2001. Ranking the ability of wheat varieties to compete with Lolium rigidum. Weed Research 41 (3): 197–209.
27.
Maćkowiak W. 2003. Estimation of progress and strategic directions of triticale breeding in Poland. Institute of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization 230: 127–141.
28.
Marczewska K. 2006. Phytotoxicity and efficacy of chlorsulfuron in winter wheat. Journal of Plant Protection Research 46 (4): 387–396.
29.
Marwat K.B., Azim Khan M., Hashim S., Nawab K., Khattak A.M. 2011. Integrated weed management in wheat. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43 (1): 625–633.
30.
Mittal R.K., Sethi G.S. 2005. Genetic variability in triticale x bread wheat derivatives under normal and phosphorus stress regimes. Journal of Environmental Biology 26 (1): 105–107.
31.
Murkowski A., Skórska E. 1994. Estimation of Triticale varieties susceptibility on some herbicides by means of luminescence tests. Zeszyty Naukowe – Akademia Rolnicza w Szczecinie 162: 179–183. (in Polish).
32.
Nadeem M.A., Ahmad R., Khalid M., Naveed M., Tanveer A., Ahmad J.N. 2008. Growth and yield response of autumn planted maize (Zea mays L.) and its weeds to reduced doses of herbicide application in combination with urea. Pakistan Journal of Botany 40 (2): 667–676.
33.
O’Donovan J.T., Harker K.N., Clayton G.W., Hall L.M. 2000. Wild oat (Avena fatua) interference in barley (Hordeum vulgare) is influenced by barley variety and seeding rate. Weed Technology 14 (3): 624–629.
34.
Oettler G. 2005. The fortune of a botanical curiosity – Triticale: past, present and future. The Journal of Agriculture Science 143 (5): 329–346.
35.
O’Keffe P., Wilhelm N. 1993. The hidden costs of herbicide use on micronutrient-poor soils. In: “Farming – from Paddockk to Plate“ (G.K. McDonald, W.D. Bellotti, eds.). Proceedings of the 7th Australian Agronomy Conference. The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, south Australia, 19–24 September 1993. www.regional.org.au/au/asa/1993/concurrent/weeds/p-02.htm[Accessed: May 20, 2014].
36.
Pederson R.N., Black I.D., Dyson C.B., Hannam R.J. 1994. Effects of the herbicide metsulfuron-methyl on root length, nutrient levels, grain protein, and yield of barley. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34 (4): 499–504.
37.
Raatz L., Hills M., McKenzie R., Yang R.C., Topinka K., Hall L. 2011. Tolerance of spring triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) to four wheat herbicides. Weed Technology 25 (1): 84–89.
38.
Rengel Z., Wheal M.S. 1997. Herbicide chlorsulfuron decreases growth of fine roots and micronutrient uptake in wheat genotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany 48 (309): 927–934.
39.
Rola H., Kieloch R. 2006. Reaction of winter wheat cultivars to chlorsulfuron applied in the autumn and in the spring. Progress of Plant Protection/Postępy w Ochronie Roślin 46 (2): 261–264. (in Polish with English summary).
40.
Stankiewicz C. 2004. Effect of sowing density, herbicides and harrowing application on yield and content of total protein and starch in ‘Wanad’ spring triticale kernels. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura 3 (2): 77–88.
41.
Theimt E.M., Oettler G. 2008. Agronomic performance of anthem derived doubled haploid and single seed descent lines in crosses between primary and secondary winter triticale. Plant Breeding 127 (5): 476–479.
42.
Ullah W., Azim Khan M., Arifullah A., Sadiq M. 2008. Evaluation of integrated management practices for maize. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 14 (1–2): 19–32.
43.
Watson P.R., Derksen D.A., Acker R. 2006. The ability of 29 barley cultivars to compete and withstand competition. Weed Science 54 (4): 783–792.
44.
Weber R., Kieloch R. 2013. Influence of herbicides on yield stability of winter wheat cultivars under different sowing rates. International Journal of Plant Production 7 (1): 55–65.
45.
Yamauti M.S., Costa Aguiar Alves P.L., Carvalho L.B. 2011. Competitive interactions of triticale (Triticum turgidsecale) and jointed charlock (Raphanus raphanistrum) in function of plant population and proportion. Planta Daninha 29 (1): 129–135.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1899-007X |
| ISSN: | 1427-4345 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
