ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Assessment of the nematicidal potential of vermicompost, vermicompost tea, and urea application on the potato-cyst nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pallida
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, 040 01, Košice, Slovak Republic
 
2
Department of Agrochemistry and Plant Nutrition, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 01 Nitra, Slovak Republic
 
 
Submission date: 2014-11-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2015-05-04
 
 
Corresponding author
Marek Renčo
Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, 040 01, Košice, Slovak Republic
 
 
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2015;55(2):187-192
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The addition of organic material to the soil can be an effective alternative to the environmentally unsafe chemical treat- ments that are used to control plant parasitic nematodes. We evaluated the effects of vermicompost alone, and aqueous solutions of vermicompost (vermicompost tea) either alone or mixed with urea, on the development and survival of two potato-cyst nematodes: Globodera rostochiensis (pathotype Ro1) and G. pallida (pathotype Pa2) and on the growth parameters of the host potato plants. Soil amendments with these materials significantly decreased the number of cysts · 400 g–1 of both species in the soil, the number of eggs and juveniles · cyst–1 of both species, and the number of eggs and juveniles · g–1 of both species in the soil, relative to the untreated controls. The suppressive effect was significantly higher at the highest dose than the lowest treatment dose, for all tested materials. Globodera rostochiensis was more sensitive to all the tested materials than G. pallida. The aqueous solutions of vermicompost alone or in combination with urea were more effective than the solid vermicompost used alone, for controlling both species. Vermicompost and the vermicompost teas had positive effects on plant fresh stem weight and stem height. The application of vermicompost tea instead of the solid vermicompost, substantially decreased the amount of material needed. These amendments are thus promising for the control of potato-cyst nematodes in sustainable agricultural systems.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
 
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Akhtar M. 1997. Current options in integrated management of plant-parasitic nematodes. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 2: 187–197.
 
2.
Arancon N.Q., Edwards C.A., Bierman P., Metzger J.D., Lucht C. 2005. Effects of vermicomposts produced from cattle manure, food waste and paper waste on the growth and yields of peppers in the field. Pedobiologia 49 (4): 297–306.
 
3.
Arancon N.Q., Edwards C.A., Lee S.S., Yardim E. 2002. Management of plant parasitic nematode populations by use of vermicomposts. p. 705–710. In: Proceedings of Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Pest and Disease, Brighton, UK, 18–21 November, 2002.
 
4.
Arancon N.Q., Edwards C.A., Oliver T.J., Byrne R.J. 2007. Suppression of two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) mealy bug (Pseudococcus sp.) and aphid (Myzus persicae) populations and damage by vermicomposts. Crop Protection 26 (1): 26–39.
 
5.
Atiyeh R.M., Subler S., Edwards C.A., Bachman G., Metzger J.D., Shuster W. 2000. Effects of vermicomposts and composts on plant growth in horticultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia 44 (5): 579–590.
 
6.
Avato P., D ́Addabbo T., Leonetti P., Argentieri M.P. 2013. Nematicidal potential of Brassicaceae. Phytochemical Review 12 (4): 791–802.
 
7.
Bilgrami A.L. 1996. Evaluation of the predation abilities of the mite Hypoaspis calcuttaensis, predaceous on plant and soil nematodes. Fundamental & Applied Nematology 20: 96–98.
 
8.
Brown E.B. 1969. Assessment of the damage caused to potatoes by potato cyst eelworm Heterodera rostochiensis Woll. Annals of Applied Biology 63 (3): 493–502.
 
9.
Buckerfield J.C., Flavel T., Lee K.E., Webster K.A. 1999. Vermicomposts in solid and liquid form as plant growth promoter. Pedobiologia 43 (6): 753–759.
 
10.
Conn K.L., Lazarovits G. 1999. Impact of animal manures on Verticillium wilt, potato scab and soil microbial community. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 21 (1): 81–92.
 
11.
Edwards C., Arancon N.Q., Vasko-Bennett M., Askar A., Keeney G., Little B. 2009a. Suppression of green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) (Sulz.), citrus mealy bug (Planococcus citri) (Risso) and two spotted mite (Tetranychus urticae) (Koch.)attacks on tomatoes and cucumber by aqueous extracts from vermicomposts. Crop Protection 29 (1): 80–93.
 
12.
Edwards C., Arancon N.Q., Vasko-Bennett M., Askar A., Keeney G. 2009b. Effect of aqueous extracts from vermicomposts on attacks by cucumber beetles (Acalymna vittatum) (Fabr.) on cucumbers and tobacco hornworms (Manduca sexta) on tomatoes. Pedobiologia 53 (2): 141–148.
 
13.
Edwards C., Arancon N.Q., Sherman R. 2011. Vermiculture Technology. CRC Press, USA, 623 pp.
 
14.
EPPO 2014. A1 and A2 Lists of Pests Recommended for Regulation as Quarantine Pests. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, Paris, France, 16 pp.
 
15.
Evans K., Haydock P.P.J. 1990. A review of tolerance by potato plants of cyst nematode attack, with consideration of what factors may confer tolerance and methods of assaying and improving it in crops. Annals of Applied Biology 117 (3): 703–740.
 
16.
Greco N. 1988. Potato Cyst Nematodes: Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida. NematologyCircular No. 149. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consuner Services, Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, FL, USA, 4 pp.
 
17.
Haydock P.P.J., Woods S.R., Grove I.G., Hare M.C. 2013. Chemical control of nematodes. p. 259–279. In: “Plant Nematology” (R.N. Perry, M. Moens, eds.). 2nd ed. CABI, Wallingord, UK, 568 pp.
 
18.
Ismail A.E., Rawia A.E, El-Nagdi W.M.A. 2006. Effect of different composts, biofertilizers and olive pomace as soil amendments on Rotylenchulus reniformis, growth and chemical analysis of jasmine Egypt. Journal of Applied Science Research 2 (11): 909–916.
 
19.
Karajeh M.R. 2008. Interaction of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) and tomato as affected by hydrogen peroxide. Journal of Plant Protection Research 48 (2): 181–187.
 
20.
Kerry B. 1988. Fungal parasites of cyst nematodes. p. 293–306. In: “Biological Interactions in Soil” (C.A. Edwards, B.R. Stinner, D. Stinner, S. Rabatin, eds.). Elsevier, 380 pp.
 
21.
Kirmani M.R., Alam M.M., Khan A.M., Saxena S.K. 1975. Effect of different carbon: nitrogen ratios on the population of nematodes and fungi and plant growth of cabbage. Indian Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 5: 22–30.
 
22.
Mian I.H., Rodríguez-Kábana R. 1982. Soil amendments with oil cakes and chicken litter for control of Meloidogyne arenaria. Nematropica12 (2): 205–220.
 
23.
Nath G., Singh K. 2011. Combination of vermicomposts and biopesticides against nematode (Pratylenchus sp.) and their effect on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). IIOAB Journal 2: 27–35.
 
24.
Oijen M.V., De Ruijter F.J., Van Haren R.J.F. 1995. Analyses of the effects of potato cyst nematodes (Globodera pallida)on growth, physiology and yield of potato cultivars in field plots at three levels of soil compaction.Annals of Applied Biology 127 (3) 499–520.
 
25.
Oka Y., Yermiyahu U. 2002. Suppressive effects of composts against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica on tomato. Nematology 4 (8): 891–898.
 
26.
Pandey R. 2005. Management of Meloigodyne incognita in Artemisia pallens with bio-organics. Phytoparasitica 33 (3): 304–308.
 
27.
Renčo M., Sasanelli N., D ́Addabbo T., Papajová I. 2010. Soil nematode community changes associated with composts amendment. Nematology 12 (5): 681–692.
 
28.
Renčo M. 2013. Organic amendments of soil as useful tools of plant parasitic nematodes control: review. Helminthologia 50 (1): 3–14.
 
29.
Renčo M., Sasanelli N., Kováčik P. 2011. The effect of soil compost treatments on potato cyst nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pallida. Helminthologia 48 (3): 184–194.
 
30.
Renčo M., Sasanelli N., Maistrello L. 2014. Plants as natural sources of nematicides. p. 115–141. In: “Nematodes: Comparative Genomics, Disease Management and Ecological Importance. Chapter: Plants as Natural Sources of Nematicides” (Lee M. Davis, ed.). NOVA Science publisher, New York, 120 pp.
 
31.
Rodriguez-Kábana R. 1986. Organic and inorganic amendments to soil as nematode suppressant. Journal of Nematology 18 (2): 129–135.
 
32.
Sabová M., Valocká B. 1980. Parasitic nematodes of cereals in Slovak Republic. Agricultural26: 278–258.
 
33.
Sasanelli N., Takacs A.A., D’Addabbo T., Biro I., Malov X. 2009. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the nematicidal properties of leaf extracts of Thymus vulgaris L. Helminthologia 46 (4): 230–240.
 
34.
Seenivasan N., Poornima K. 2010. Bio-management of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood in jasmine (Jasminum sambac L.). Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystem 16 (1): 34–40.
 
35.
Sharma S.B. 1998. The Cyst Nematodes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 452 pp.
 
36.
Subler S., Edwards C.A., Metzger J. 1998. Comparing vermicomposts and composts. BioCycle 39: 63–66.
 
37.
Tomati U., Galli E., Grappelli A., Dihena G. 1990. Effect of earth-worm casts on protein synthesis in radish and lettuce seedlings. Biology and Fertility of Soils 9: 288–289.
 
38.
Vasyukova N.I., Zinovieva S.V., Udalova Z.V., Pridorova S.M., Ozeretskovskaya O.L. 2006. Immunomodulating effect of elicitors and suppressors upon infection of potato with Globodera rostochiensis (Wollenweber, 1923) Beherens.Doklady Biological Sciences 411:449–451.
 
39.
Vibha M. 2010. Effect of fungal metabolites and amendments on mycelial growth of Rhizoctonia solani. Journal of Plant Protection Research 50 (1): 93–97.
 
40.
Yardim E.N., Arancon N.Q., Edwards C.A., Oliver T.J., Byrne R.J. 2006. Suppression by vermicomposts of tomato hornworm (Manduca quinquemaculata) and cucumber beetle (Acalymma vittatum) populations and damage. Pedobiologia 50 (1): 23–29.
 
eISSN:1899-007X
ISSN:1427-4345
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top