ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Chemical control of broadleaf weeds in autumn-sown rainfed chickpea
1
Plant Protection Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Kermanshah, Iran
2
Plant Protection Research Department, Kurdestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Sanandaj, Iran
3
Plant Protection Research Department, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Khorramabad, Iran
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
Submission date: 2019-03-10
Acceptance date: 2019-11-05
Online publication date: 2019-12-09
Corresponding author
Mozhgan Veisi
Plant Protection Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Kermanshah, Iran
Plant Protection Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Kermanshah, Iran
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2019;59(4):552-560
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Weed control is the most important constraint of autumn-sown chickpea production. Field
experiments were conducted at three sites to evaluate the yield response of autumn-sown
rainfed chickpea and weed control with PRE pendimethalin, POST pyridate, PRE isoxaflutole,
preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) of imazethapyr through hand-weeded,
untreated and weed free checks. The results showed that pyridate was the safest option
for weed control in chickpea. The highest grain yield of chickpea was obtained with application
of pyridate followed by isoxaflutolein three sites. Imazethapyr and metribuzin caused
higher visual injuries than the other treatments. Furthermore, the applications of pyridate,
isoxaflutole, metribuzin, and pendimethalin, as well as PRE and POST imazethapyr were
found to reduce the total weed densities (averaged for three locations) by as much as 76, 75,
75.4, 43, 64, and 64.5% within 30 days after treatments, respectively.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Abugho S.B.E., Burgos N.R., Singh V., Estorninos Jr L.E., Chen P., Motes D. 2015. Crop response of edamame soybean varieties to foliar and soil-applied herbicides. p. 105–108. In: “Arkansas Soybean Research Studies”, 227 pp.
2.
Ahmadi A., Mousavi K. 2017. Study of flora and mapping the distribution of weeds on field Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Khorramabad. Plant Ecophysiology 9: 177–190.
3.
Ahmadi A., Mousavi S.K., Ghiasvand M., Hasanvand A. 2013. Investigation flora and distribution of weed species of field peas (Cicer arietinum L.) in Khorramabad. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences 2: 537–543.
4.
Ahmadi G.H., Rahimian H. 1997 Critical period of weed control in rainfed chickpea in Kermanshah province. Ph.D dissertation. Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, 164 pp.
5.
Akbari A., Zand E., Mousavi S.K. 2010. Evaluation the effect of row space and weed management approaches on biomass, chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield and yield components in Khorramabad dryland conditions. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 3 (3): 1–21.
6.
Arya R.L. 2004. Integrated weed management in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) + mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping system under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 49: 98–100.
7.
Baghestani M.A., Zand E., Soufizadeh S., Eskandari A., Pour Azar R., Veysi M., Nassirzadeh N. 2007. Efficacy evaluation of some dual purpose herbicides to control weeds in maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Protection 26: 936–942. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cr....
8.
Baghestani M.A., Zand E., Rahimian Mashhadi H., Soufizadeh S. 2005. Morphological and physiological characteristics which enhance competitiveness of autumn wheat (Triticum aestivum) against Goldbachia laevigata. Iranian Journal of Weed Science 1: 111–126.
9.
Chalechale Y., Minbashi Moeni M., Shiranirad A.H. 2014. Weed mapping in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) fields and prediction of their presence in agricultural lands of Kermanshah province using geographic information system. Journal of Weed Ecology 2: 95–112.
10.
Datta A., Sindel B.M., Kristiansen P., Jessop R.S., Felton W.L. 2009. Effect of isoxaflutole on the growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Crop protection 28: 923–927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crop....
11.
Jafarzadeh N., Shimi P. 2004. A field evaluation of isoxaflutole as a new herbicide in chickpea fields. In: Proceeding of the 16th Iranian Plant Protection Congress: Plant Disease and Weeds. University of Tehran, Tabriz, Iran, 591 p.
12.
Johnson E.N., Ulrich D.J., Blackshaw R.E., Sapsford K.L., Holms F.A. 2007. Effect of timing of isoxaflutole application on weed control in Desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). In: Proceeding of Soils and Crops Workshop. March 1–2, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
13.
Johnson E., Bueckert R.A., Willenborg C. 2017. Crop damage - more than just herbicides. In: Soils and Crops Workshop. March 6–7, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
14.
Hoseiny-Rad M., Jagannath S. 2011. Effect of herbicide Imazethapyr (pursuit™) on chickpea seed germination. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 44 (3): 224–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/032354....
15.
Goud V.V., Murade N.B., Khakre M.S., Patil A.N. 2013. Efficacy of imazethapyr and quizalofop-ethyl herbicides on growth and yield of chickpea. The Bioscan 8 (3): 1015–1018.
16.
Green J.M., Strek H.J. 2001. British crop protection council conference – weeds. p. 505–512. In: Proceedings of an international conference, Brighton Crop Protection Conference: Weeds. 12-15 November 2001, Brighton, UK.
17.
Knights E. 1991. Chickpea. p. 27–38. In: “New Crops-Agronomy and Potential of Alternative Crop Species” (Jessop R.S., Wright R.L., Eds.). Kata Press. Melbourne, Australia.
18.
Knott C.M., Halila M.H. 1988. Weed in food legumes: problems, effects and control methods. In: Proceedings of an International Conference on Food Legumes. Spokane, USA, 6–11 July 1988.
19.
Khope D., Kumar S., Pannu R.K. 2011. Evaluation of postemergence herbicides in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Indian Journal of Weed Science 43 (1–2): 92–93.
20.
Lewis K.A.T., Zilivakis J., Warner D., Green A. 2016. An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 22 (4): 1050–1064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/108070....
21.
Lindsey A.J., DeFrank J., Cheng Z. 2019. Seashore paspalum and bermudagrass response to spray applications of post emergence herbicides. Hort Technology1: 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTT....
22.
Lyon D.J., Wilson R.G. 2005. Chemical weed control in dryland and irrigated chickpea. Weed Technology 19: 959–965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-05-....
23.
Mohammadi G., Javanshir A., Khooie F.R., Mohammadi S.A., ZehtabSalmasi S. 2005. Criticalperiod of weed interference in chickpea. Weed Research 45: 57–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
24.
Moomaw R., Martin A. 1978. Interaction of metribuzin and trifluralin with soil type on soybean (Glycine max) growth. Weed Science 26 (4): 327–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S00431....
25.
Mousavi S.K., Pezeshkpour P., Shahverdi M. 2007. Weed population response to chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) variety, and planting date. Journal of Water and Soil Science (Journal of Science and Technology Agricultural and Natural Resources) 40: 167–177.
26.
Mousavi S.K., Sabeti P., Jafarzadeh N., Bazzazi D. 2010. Evaluation of some herbicides efficacy for weed control in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 1: 19–31.
27.
Pilcher W., Zandkamiri H., Arceneaux K., Harrison S., Baisakh N. 2017. Genome-wide microarray analysis leads to identification of genes in response to herbicide, metribuzin in wheat leaves. PlosOne 13 (6): 0199564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
28.
Plancqaert P.H., Braun P.H., Werry J. 1990. Agronomic studies on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) options Mediterraneaneessevieseminaries. Crop Science 9: 87–92.
29.
Poonia T.C., Pithia M.S. 2013. Pre and postemergence herbicides for weed management in chickpea. Indian Journal of Weed Science 45 (3): 223–225.
31.
Sandral G.A., Dear B.S., Pratley J.E., Cullis B.R. 1997. Herbicide dose rate response curves in subterranean clover determined by a bioassay. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 37: 67–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9606....
32.
Sanjeev K.R., Dodamani B.M., Kowser T., Mallikarjun M. 2015. Bioefficacy of herbicides for weed management in irrigated chickpea. In: Proceedings in 25th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference on Weed Science for Sustainable Agriculture, Environment and Biodiversity. Hyderabad, India: Indian Society of Weed Science, 225 pp.
33.
Saxena N.P., Saxena M.C., Johansen C., Virmani S.M., Harris H. (eds.) 1996. Adaptation of Chickpea in the West Asia and North Africa Region. ICRISAT; Hyderabad, India, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.
34.
Singh R.P., Verma S.K. Singh R.K. 2016. Effects of herbicides on growth and yield of Cicer arietinum L. under rainfed condition. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 45 (2): 305–311.
35.
Solh M.B., Pala M. 1990. Weed control in chickpeas. p. 93–99. In: “Present Status and Future Prospects of Chickpea Crop Production and Improvement in the Mediterranean Countries” (Saxena M.C., Cubero J.I., Wery J., eds.). CIHEAM, Zaragoza, Spain.
36.
Taran B., Holm F., Banniza S. 2013. Response of chickpea cultivars to pre- and postemergence herbicide applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 93 (2): 279–286. DOI: 10.4141/cjps2012-167.
37.
Tiwari D., Meena V.D. 2016. Effect of sowing dates and weed management on growth and yield of chickpea in indogangetic plains. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 86 (1): 33–38.
38.
Uygur S., Gürbüz R., Uygur F.N. 2010. Weeds of onion fields and effects of some herbicides on weeds in Cukurova region, Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology 9 (42): 7037–7042.
39.
Varanasi A., Prasad P.V., Jugulam M. 2016. Impact of climate change factors on weeds and herbicide efficacy. Advances in Agronomy 135: 107–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agr....
40.
Vasilakoglou I., Vlachostergios D., Dhima K., Lithourgidis A. 2013. Response of vetch, lentil, chickpea and red pea to pre-or post-emergence applied herbicides. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 11 (4): 1101–1111. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar....
41.
Veisi M., Mansouri M.S., Ghiasvand M. 2017. Survey of possibility weed control in autumn and entezari (winter) chickpea fields. Technical Report of Plant Protection Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Kermanshah, Iran NO. 52268/96, 10 pp.
42.
Yousefi A.R., Alizade H. 2006. Investigation of single and integrated application of different herbicides on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield and its components in winter sowing. p. 420–422. In: Proceedings of the 15th Australian Weeds Conference. Managing Weeds in a Changing Climate, Adelaide, South Australia.
43.
Zand E., Baghestani M., Nezamabadi N., Shimi P. 2010. Application Guide of Registered Herbicides in Iran. 4th ed. Jihade-e-Daneshgahi Press, Mashhad, Iran.
| eISSN: | 1899-007X |
| ISSN: | 1427-4345 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
