ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Degradation rate of chloridazon in soil as influenced by adjuvants
1
institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, State Research Institute
Department of Weed Science and Tillage Systems
Orzechowa 61, 50-540 Wrocław, Poland
Corresponding author
Mariusz Kucharski
institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, State Research Institute Department of Weed Science and Tillage Systems Orzechowa 61, 50-540 Wrocław, Poland
institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, State Research Institute Department of Weed Science and Tillage Systems Orzechowa 61, 50-540 Wrocław, Poland
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2012;52(1):114-117
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of an adjuvant addition on chloridazon degradation rate in soil. The
experiment was carried out under controlled laboratory conditions. Chloridazon was applied alone and in a mixture with three
different adjuvants: oil, surfactant and multicomponent (used for preemergence application). Chloridazon residue was analysed using gas chromatography with electron capture detector (GC/ECD). Good linearity was found between logarithmic concentration of
chloridazon residues and time. The addition of oil and surfactant adjuvants slowed down the degradation of chloridazon in soil. The
DT
50
values for the mixture of chloridazon + oil and surfactant adjuvants was about 8–14 days higher in comparison with the DT
50
for
chloridazon applied alone (43 days). No significant differences were observed between degradation rates and the DT
50
for chloridazon
applied alone and with a multicomponent adjuvant.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (33)
1.
Allen R., Walker A. 1988. Effects of microbial inhibitors on the degradation rates of metamitron, metazachlor and metribuzin in soil. Pestic. Sci. 22: 297–305.
2.
Boesten J.J.T.I. 2000. From laboratory to field: uses and limitations of pesticide behaviour models for the soil/plant system. Weed Res. 40(1): 123–138.
3.
Bruce J.A., Carey J.B. 1996. Effect of growth stage and environment on foliar absorption, translocation, metabolism and activity of nicosulfuron in quackgrass (Elytrigia repens).Weed Sci. 44: 447–454.
4.
Cabrera D., Lopez-Pineiro A., Albarran A., Pena D. 2010. Direct and residual effects on diuron behaviour and persistence following two-phase olive mill waste addition to soil. Geoderma 157 (3/4): 133–141.
5.
Capri E., Ghebbioni C., Trevisan M. 1995. Metamitron and chloridazon dissipation in a silty clay loam soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43: 247–253.
6.
Cuevas M.V., Cox L., Calderon M.J., Hermosin M.C., Fernandez J.E. 2007. Chloridazon and lenacil dissipation in a clayey soil of the Guadalquivir river marshes (southwest Spain). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 124 (3–4): 245–251.
7.
Diez C., Barrado E. 2010. Soil-dissipation kinetics of twelve herbicides used on a rain-fed barley crop in Spain. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 397: 1617–1626.
8.
Dexter A.G., Zollinger R.K. 2001. Weed control guide for sugarbeet. Sugarbeet Res. Extend Rep. 32: 3–22.
9.
Fan de Fang, Pestemer W., Malkomes H.P. 1983. Effect of various pesticides of a sugar-beet spray program on biological activities and chloridazon degradation in soil. II. Pot trials and laboratory experiments. Weed Res. 23: 293–304.
10.
Foster D.K., Taylor W.A., Parsons R.G. 2006. Effects of adjuvants on the deposition, retention and efficacy of pesticides. Aspects Appl. Biol. 77 (1): 127–132.
11.
Krogh K.A., Halling-Sorensen B., Mogensen B.B., Vejrup K.V. 2003. Environmental properties and effects of nonionic surfactant adjuvants in pesticides: a review. Chemosphere 50: 871–901.
12.
Kucharski M. 2003. Influence of herbicide and adjuvant application on residues in soil and plant of sugar beet. J. Plant Protection Res. 43 (3):225–232.
13.
Kucharski M., Sadowski J. 2009a. Degradation of ethofumesate in soil under laboratory conditions. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 18 (2): 243–247.
14.
Kucharski M., Sadowski J. 2009b. Influence of adjuvants on behavior of phenmedipham in plant and soil environment. Pol. J. Agron. 1: 32–36.
15.
Leistra M. 1971. Diffusion of 1,3-dichloropropene from a plane source in soil. Pestic. Sci. 2: 75–79.
16.
Levitan L., Merwin I., Kovach J. 1995. Assessing the relative environmental impacts of agricultural pesticides: the quest for a holisic method. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 55: 153–168.
17.
Mata-Sandoval J.K., Karns J., Torrents A. 2001. Influence of rhamnolipids and Triton X-100 on the biodegradation of three pesticides in aqueous phase and soil slurries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49: 3296–3303.
18.
McMullan P.M., Thomas J.M., Volgas G. 1998. HM9679 – a spray adjuvant for soil-applied herbicides. p. 285–294. In: Proc. 5th International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals (P.M. McMullan, ed.). Memphis, USA, 17–21 August 1998, 519 pp.
19.
Pannacci E., Mathiassen S.K., Kudsk P. 2010. Effect of adjuvants on the rainfastness and performance of tribenuron-methyl ob broad-leaved weeds. Weed Biol. Manage. 10 (2): 126–131.
20.
Pestemer W., Malkomes H.P. 1983. Effect of various pesticides of a sugar-beet spray program on biological activities and chloridazon degradation in soil. I. Field experiments. Weed Res. 23: 283–291.
21.
Pettygrove D.R., Naylor D.V. 1985. Metribuzin degradation kinetics in organically amended soil. Weed Sci. 33 (2): 267–270.
22.
Ravelli A., Pantani O., Calamai L., Fust P. 1997. Rates of chlorsulfuron degradation in three Brazilian oxisoils. Weed Res. 37: 51–59.
23.
Reddy K.N. 1993. Effect of acrylic polymer adjuvants on leaching of bromacil, diuron, norfurazon and simazine in soil columns. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 50: 449–457.
24.
Rodriguez-Cruz M.S., Sanchez-Martin M.J., Andrades M.S., Sanchez-Camazano M. 2007. Retention of pesticides in soil columns modified in situ and ex situ with a cationic surfactant. Sci. Total Environ. 378 (1/2): 104–112.
25.
Rouchaud J., Neus O., Hermann O. 1997. Influence of application rate and manure amendment on chloridazon dissipation in the soil. Weed Res. 37: 121–127.
26.
Russo E., Fava A., Achilli F., Sassi E. 1993. Groundwater contamination by pesticides: extensive field studies. p. 707–718. In: Proc. IX Symposium in Pesticide Chemistry: Mobility and Degradation of Xenobiotics (G. Biagini-Lucca, ed.). Lucca, Italy, 11–13 October 1993, 832 pp.
27.
Sharma S.D., Kirkwood R.C., Whateley T.I. 1996. Effect of nonionic nonylphenol surfactants on surface physicochemical properties, uptake and distribution of asulam and diflufenican. Weed Res. 36: 227–239.
28.
Swarcewicz M., Muliński Z., Zbieć I. 1998. Influence of spray adjuvants on the behavior of trifluralin in the soil. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 60: 569–576.
29.
Tomlin C.D.S. (ed.). 2006. Chloridazon. p. 169–170. In: “The Pesticide Manual”. 14th ed. BCPC Publication: Alton-Hempshire, UK, 1349 pp.
30.
Van der Pas L.J.T., Matser A.M., Boesten J.J.T.I., Leistra M. 1999. Behaviour of metamitron and hydroxy-chlorothalonil in low-humic sandy soils. Pestic. Sci. 55: 923–934.
31.
Van der Werf H.M.G. 1996. Assessing the impact of pesticides on the environment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 60: 81–96.
32.
Vink J.P.M., Nortersheuser P., Richter O., DiekkrugerB., Groen K.P. 1994. Modelling the microbial breakdown of pesticides in soil using a parameter estimation technique. Pestic. Sci. 40: 285–292.
33.
Walker A. 1974. A simulation model for prediction of herbicide persistence. J. Environ. Quality 3: 396–401.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1899-007X |
| ISSN: | 1427-4345 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
