ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Spray classification for selected flat fan nozzles
 
More details
Hide details
1
Poznań University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural Engineering Department of Plant Production Engineering Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
 
 
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2012;52(1):180-183
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The flat fan nozzles made by Mikołajczak Agro Technology Company (MMAT) (standard RS, and pre-orifice AZ), in the ISO sizes of: 02, 03, and 04 were evaluated. The spray quality parameters: D V10 , D V50 , D V90 , and RS, in the working pressure range of: 150, 300 and 450 kPa, were determined. The coefficient of volume fraction droplets smaller than 100 μm was also calculated. The spray classification of MMAT nozzles was defined according to ASAE standards. This information should be useful for the sprayer operator when making a selection of a field sprayer’s working parameters according to the pesticide use guide
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
 
REFERENCES (11)
1.
ASAE S572.1. 2009. Spray Nozzle Classification By Droplet Spectra.
 
2.
Czaczyk Z. 2011. Wear characteristics of selected flat fan nozzles. Technika Rolnicza Ogrodnicza Leśna 5: 16–18.
 
3.
Czaczyk Z., Bäcker G. 2009. Drift reducing nozzle systems for space cultures. 11th International Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, ICLASS 2009. Vail, Colorado, 26–30 July 2009, p. 5.
 
4.
Dorr G.J. 2010. Modeling the influence of droplet properties, fomulation and plant canopy on spray distribution. Aspects Appl. Biol. 99: 341–349.
 
5.
Hewitt A.J. 1997. The importance of droplet size in agricultural spraying. Atomization and Sprays 7 (3): 235–244.
 
6.
Hewitt A.J. 2001. Developments in international harmonization of pesticide drift mana-gement. Phytoparasitica 29 (2): 93–96.
 
7.
Holterman H.J. 2003. Statistics of spray deposition and drift for inhomogeneous suspens-ions. p. 1–8. In: Proc. ILASS Conference. Sorrento, Italy, 13–17 July 2003.
 
8.
The list of certified nozzles at Julius Kühn Institute in Braunschweig (February 2011):http://www.jki.bund.de/fileadm....
 
9.
Southcombe E.S.E., Miller P.C.H., Ganzelmeier H., van de Zande J.C., Miralles A., Hewitt A.J. 2007. The International (BCPC) Spray Classification System including a drift potential factor. p. 371–380. In: Proc. BCPC Crop Protection Conference – Weeds.
 
10.
Spillman J.J. 1984. Spray Impaction, retention and adhesion: an introduction to basic characteristics. Pestic. Sci. 15: 97–106.
 
11.
Van de Zande J.C., Wenneker M. 2011. Nozzle classification for drift reduction in orch-ard spraying; implementation in regulation. p. 138–139. In: “Sustainable Plant Protection Techniques in Fruit Growing SuProFruit 2011”. 11th Workshop, Ctifl Lanxade, Bergerac, France, 8–10 June 2011.
 
eISSN:1899-007X
ISSN:1427-4345
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top