ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Impact of strains of entomopathogenic fungi on some main groups of soil microorganisms
 
More details
Hide details
1
Plant Protection Institute, 35 Panajot Volov Str., 2230 Kostinbrod, Bulgaria
 
2
Institute of Soil Science “N. Pushkarov”, 7 Shosse Bankya Str., 1080 Sofia
 
 
Corresponding author
Slavimira Draganova
Plant Protection Institute, 35 Panajot Volov Str., 2230 Kostinbrod, Bulgaria
 
 
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2008;48(2):169-179
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The influence of entomopathogenic fungal strains – one Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorok. and seven Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill. on some main groups of soil microorganisms was studied after introduction of their conidia into the soil. The soil samples were analyzed for densities of bacteria, actinomycetes and fungi by decimal dilutions of soil suspensions grown on selective media. The presence of conidia of fungal strains in the soil after a month from introduction was proved by bait method. Three of the strains of B. bassiana were established to be of the highest persistence, this being expressed by mortality of Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) larvae from 70% to 90%, followed by strains 224Re of B. bassiana and 31 of M. anisopliae. The obtained results showed that examined strains of the entomopathogenic fungi manifested different in manner and varying in degrees of impact on density of the main groups of soil microorganisms. Relatively insignificant changes were established under the influence of the strains 224Re B. bassiana and 31 M. anisopliae. The other strains of B. bassiana caused alterations in microbial balance expressed in different manner – stimulation or suppression on density of free-living nitrogen-fixing microorganisms, mineral nitrogen utilizing bacteria, spore-forming bacteria, cellulose degrading microorganisms, actinomycetes, soil fungi. So each strain could be characterized by specific impact on examined groups of soil microorganisms. The strain 412 of B. bassiana showed the most strongly manifested stimulation effect on the heterotrophic microorganisms, on the mineral nitrogen utilizing bacteria, on the free-living nitrogen-fixing microorganisms and the soil fungi – 14, 15, 7 and 30 times higher density of the microorganisms compared to the control treatments. The same strain caused high degree of suppression on densities of cellulose degrading microorganisms – 0.0064 x 106 compared to 0.0305 x 106 CFU/g in the control treatment. Densities of the soil spore-forming bacteria were not affected by the examined strains of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae. In the conducted experiments it has been established that the manifested impact on actinomycetes density by strains of the entomopathogenic fungi B. bassiana and M. anisopliae was different in manner and varying in degrees, on the contrary to the stimulation influence on density of the soil fungi.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
 
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Augustyniuk-Kram A., Mandrik M., Romanovskaya T., Kolomiets E., Kuptsov V. 2007. Survival rate, insecticidal and fungistatic activity of antagonistic actinomycete Streptomyces griseoviridis and entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana in separate and combined introduction to the soil. J. Plant Prot. Res. 47 (2): 179–186.
 
2.
Bidochka M.J., Kamp A.M., Lavender T.M., DeKoning J., De Croos J.N.A. 2001. Habitat association in two genetic groups of the insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae: Uncovering cryptic species? Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 1335–1342.
 
3.
Bidochka M.J., Menzies F.V., Kamp A.M. 2002. Genetic groups of the insect pathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana are associated with habitat and thermal growth preferences. Archiv. Microbiol. 178: 531–537.
 
4.
Gushterov G., Todorov T., Kominkov L. 1970. Laboratory Manual on Microbiology. Publ. House “Science & Art”, 156 pp.
 
5.
Humber R. 1997. Fungi: Identification. p. 153–185. In: “Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology”. Academic Press, London.
 
6.
Jung K., Fuller-Schaefer C., Larson B., Jaronski S.T. 2005. Observations on the interaction between biocontrol fungi, Metarhizium and Beauveria, and bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of sugar beets. In: “38th Annual Meeting of the Society for Invertebrate Pathology”. 7–11 August 2005, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
 
7.
Keller S., Kessler P., Schweizer C. 2003. Distribution of insect pathogenic soil fungi in Switzerland with special reference to Beauveria brongniartii and Metarhizium anisopliae. Biocontrol 48: 307–319.
 
8.
McCoy C., Quintela E.D., De Faria M. 2000. Environmental Persistence of Entomopathogenic Fungi. In: “Factors Affecting the Survival of Entomopathogens (M.E. Baur, J.R. Fuxa, eds.). Lousiana State University Agricultural Center, Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 400. http://www.agrctr.Isu.edu/s265....
 
9.
Meyling N. 2007. Methods for Isolation of Entomopathogenic Fungi from the Soil Environment. Laboratory Manual, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 18 pp.
 
10.
Meyling N., Eilenberg J. 2006. Occurrence and distribution of soil borne entomopathogenic fungi within a single organic agroecosystem. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 113: 336–341.
 
11.
Miętkiewski R., Tkaczuk C. 1998. The spectrum and frequency of entomopathogenic fungi in litter, forest soil and arable soil: 41–44. In: “Insect Pathogens and Insect Parasitic Nematodes” (P.H. Smits, ed.). IOBC WPRS Bull. 21 (4).
 
12.
Popowska-Nowak E., Bajan C., Augustyniuk-Kram A., Kolomiets E.I., Chikileva A., Lobanok A.G. 2003. Interactions between soil microorganisms: bacteria, actinomycetes and entomopathogenic fungi of the genera Beauveria and Paecilomyces. Pol. J. Ecol. 51 (1): 85–90.
 
13.
Shields M.S., Lingg A.J., Heimsch R.C. 1981. Identification of a Penicillium urticae metabolite which inhibit Beauveria bassiana. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 38: 374–377.
 
14.
Shimazu M., Maehara N., Sato H. 2002. Density dynamics of the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana Vuillemin (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes) introduced into forest soil, and its influence on other soil microorganisms. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 37 (2): 263–269.
 
15.
Sosnowska D., Balazy S., Prishchepa L., Mikulskaya N. 2004. Biodiversity of arthropod pathogens in the Białowieźa forest. J. Plant Prot. Res. 44 (4): 313–321.
 
16.
Vänninen I. 1996. Distribution and occurrence of four entomopathogenic fungi in Finland: effect of geographical location, habitat type and soil type. Mycol. Res. 100 (1): 93–101.
 
17.
Vänninen I., Tyni-Juslin J., Hokkanen H. 2000. Persitence of augmented Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana in Finnish agricultural soils. BioControl 45 (2): 201–222 (DOI 10.1023/A:1009998919531).
 
18.
Zimmermann G. 1986. The “Galleria bait method” for detection of entomopathogenic fungi in soil. J. Appl. Entomol. 102 (2): 213–215.
 
eISSN:1899-007X
ISSN:1427-4345
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top