Serological detection and variability of tomato yellow leaf curl virus isolates from Tanzania
More details
Hide details
Department of Crop Science and Production, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania
Agricultural Research Institute, Mikocheni, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Corresponding author
Boniface D. Kashina
Department of Crop Protection, Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University, P.M.B. 1044, Zaria, Nigeria
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2007;47(4):367-373
Tomato farms in Arusha, Morogoro, Dodoma, Iringa, Kilimanjaro and Coast regions of Tanzania were surveyed to assess the incidence of the yellow leaf curl disease, and to collect infected tomato leaf samples for sero-diagnosis. The triple antibody sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (TAS-ELISA) format was adopted for the detection of disease using commercial polyclonal antiserum and monoclonal antibodies SCRI 17, SCRI 20, SCRI 23 and SCRI 33. ELISA readings were rated on a scale of 0–4. The results of the tests indicated that all the Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TY-LCV) isolates recorded high reaction values (4) with the polyclonal antibody. However, the Dodoma and Arusha isolates were rated highest in optical density (OD) reading with MAb SCRI 20 and 23. The remaining isolates produced lower OD values. All the isolates rated low (2) when tested with SCRI 33. The differences in reaction to the monoclonal antibodies of TYLCV indicated that variability exists between the coat protein epitopes of TYLCV and Tomato yellow leaf curl Tanzania virus (TYL-CTZV) on one hand, and among the TYLCTZV isolates on the other. Only the isolates from Arusha and Dodoma share a high sequence homology in coat protein with the European and related TYLCV isolates. Furthermore, the reaction with either SCRI 20 or SCRI 23 show that the isolates from Arusha and Dodoma share a high degree of homology, and could belong to one serotype. The other isolates from Morogoro, Coast and Kilimanjaro could form another serotype, while the isolate from Iringa is a different serotype. On the other hand, reaction with SCRI 17 groups the isolates in two serotypes, the Dodoma isolate alone, and another that groups the other five isolates together. It is recommended that other procedures such as DNA-DNA hybridization assays, polymerase chain reaction, restriction fragment length polymorphisms and sequencing can be combined with the use of monoclonal antisera for the detection and prediction or inference of Tomato yellow leaf curl disease (TYLCD) virus relationships at the quasi-species or strain levels in Tanzania
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
Abdel-Salam A.M. 1990. Mechanical transmission of two Egyptian isolates of Beet curly top and Tomato yellow leaf curl viruses. Bull. Facul. Agric., University of Cairo 41: 825–842.
Accotto G.P., Vaira A.M., Noris E., Caciagli P. 1994. Analysis of an in vivo generated mutant that is not transmissible by Bemisia tabaci. p. 68. In: Abstracts of first International Symposium on Geminiviruses. El Ejido, Almeria Spain, 14–17 September 1994.
Al-Musa A. 1982. Incidence, economic importance and control of tomato yellow leaf curl in Jordan. Plant Dis. 66 (7): 561–563.
AVRDC. 1993. Identification of major tomato diseases in Tanzania. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Centre. Ann. Prog. Rep.: 500–502.
Chiang B.T., Nakhla M.K., Maxwell D.P., Schoenfelder M., Green S.K. 1997. Geographical distribution of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus. A first survey using a specific DNA probe. Phytopath. Medit. 29: 1–6.
Czosnek H., Ghanim M., Ghanim M. 2002. The circulative pathway of begomoviruses in the whitefly vector Bemisia tabaci – insights from studies with Tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Ann. App. Biol. 140: 215–231.
Czosnek H., Navot N., Laterrot H. 1990.Geographical distribution of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus. A first survey using a specific DNA probe. Phytopath. Medit. 29: 1–6.
Fauquet C.M., Maxwell D.P., Gronenborn B., Stanley J. 2000. Revised proposal for naming geminiviruses. Arch. Virol. 145: 1743–1761.
Fauquet C.M., Stanley J. 2005. Revising the way we conceive and name viruses below the species level: a review of geminivirus taxonomy calls for new standardized isolate descriptors. Arch.Virol. 150: 2151–2179.
Gafni Y. 2003. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus, the intracellular dynamics of plant DNA virus. Mol. Plant Path. 4 (1): 9–15.
Harrison B.D., Robinson D.J. 1999. Natural genomic and antigenic variation in whiteflytransmitted geminiviruses (Begomoviruses). Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 37: 369–398.
Kashina B.D. 2003. Tomato yellow leaf curl disease in Tanzania: Characterization, alternative hosts and transmission. Ph.D Thesis, unpublished. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, 222 pp.
Kashina B.D., Mabagala R.B., Mpunami A.A. 2003a. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease in Tanzania: Status and strategies for sustainable management. J. Sust. Agr. 22 (2): 23–41.
Kashina B.D., Mabagala R.B., Mpunami A.A. 2003b. Biomolecular relationships among isolates of Tomato yellow leaf curl Tanzania virus. Phytoparasitica 31(2): 188–199.
Kashina B.D., Mabagala R.B., Mpunami A.A. 2002. Reservoir weed hosts of Tomato yellow leaf curl begomovirus from Tanzania.Arch. Phytopath. Plant Protect. 35 (4): 269–278.
Makkouk K.M., Latterot H. 1983. Epidemiology and control of tomato yellow leaf curl virus. p. 321. In: “Plant Virus Epidemiology” (R.T. Plumb, J.M. Thresh, eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd., Oxford, UK.
McGrath P.F., Harrison B.D. 1995. Transmission of tomato leaf curl geminiviruses by Bemisia tabaci: effects of virus isolate and vector biotype. Ann. App. Biol. 126: 307–316.
Navot N., Pichersky E., Zeidan M., Zamir D., Czosnek H. 1991. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus: A white fly-transmitted geminivirus with a single genomic molecule. Virology 185: 151–161.
Nono-Womdim R., Swai I.S., Green S.K., Gebre-Selassie K., Latterot H., Marchoux G., Opena R.T. 1996. Tomato viruses in Tanzania: Identification, distribution and disease incidence. J. South Afr. Soc. Hort. Sci. 6 (1): 41–44.
Noris E., Hidalgo E., Accotto G.P., Moriones E. 1994. High similarity among the tomato yellow leaf curl virus from the west Mediterranean basin: The nucleotide sequence of an infectious clone from Spain. Arch. Virol. 135: 165–170.
Pico B., Diez M.J., Nuez F. 1996. Viral diseases causing the greatest economic losses to the tomato crop. II. The tomato yellow leaf curl virus-a review. Sci. Hort.67: 151–196.
Pico B., Diez M.J., Nuez F. 1999. Improved diagnostic techniques for tomato yellow leaf curl virus in tomato breeding programmes. Plant Dis. 83 (11): 1006–1012.
Roberts I.M., Robinson D.J., Harrison B.D. 1984. Serological relationships and genome homologies among geminiviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 65: 1723–1730.
Rochester D.E., de Paulo J.J., Fargette C.M., Beachy R.N. 1994. Complete nucleotide sequence of the geminivirus tomato yellow leaf curl virus, Thailand isolate. J. Gen. Virol. 75: 477–485.
Rybicki E.P. 1994. A phylogenetic and evolutionary justification for three genera of Geminiviridae. Arch. Virol. 139: 49–77.
Shih S.L., Tsai W.S., Green S.K., Lee L.M. 2006. Molecular characterization of a distinct begomovirus associated with Tomato Leaf Curl Disease in Arusha of Tanzania. Plant Dis. 90, p. 1550.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top