ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Chemical control of rhododendron twig blight caused by Phytophthora Ramorum
 
More details
Hide details
1
Research Institute of Pomology & Floriculture Pomologiczna 18, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Leszek B. Orlikowski
Research Institute of Pomology & Floriculture Pomologiczna 18, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland
 
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2004;44(1):41–46
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Biological activity of 6 fungicides in the inhibition of Phytophthora ramorum sporulation and development of blight on rhododendron leaves and stems were evaluated. All tested compounds at dose 8 μg o fa.i./cm3 already inhibited zoosporangia formation at least in 73%. On leaf petioles and leaf disks, taken from rhododendron one week after treatment with fungicides, formation of chlamydospores was especially suppressed by fenamidone + phosetyl Al and oxadixyl + mancozeb whereas development o fspores was not inhibited by cymoxanil + famoxate. All tested compounds significantly inhibited the development and spread of twig blight on rhododendron. However, furalaxyl, applied as spraying of plants 48 hrs before or after inoculation of leaves and stems by P. ramorum was the most effective
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
 
REFERENCES (9)
1.
Afek U., Sztajnberg A. 1989. Effects of phosetyl – Al and phosphorous acid on scoparone,a phytoalexin associated with resistance of citrus to Phytophthora citrophthora. Phytopathology 79: 736–739.
 
2.
Benson D.M. 1980. Chemical control of rhododendron dieback caused by Phytophthora heveae. Plant Disease 64, 7: 684–686.
 
3.
Davidse L.C., Gerritsma O.C.M., Velthuis G.C.M. 1984. A differential bases of antifungal activity of acylalanine fungicides and structurally related chloroacetanilide herbicides in Phytophthora megasperma f. sp.medicaginis. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 21:301–308.
 
4.
Garbelotto M., Rizzo D.M. 2001. Preliminary studies on chemical and cultural control of Phytophthora ramorum associated with sudden Oak death. Phytopathology 91: S 30.
 
5.
Garbelotto M., Rizzo D.M., Marais L. 2002.Phytophthora ramorum and Sudden Oak Death in California:IV. Preliminary studies on chemical control. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW – GTR 184: 811–818.
 
6.
Orlikowski L.B. 1996. Phytophthora species in Polish ornamental nurseries. II. Chemical and biological control of Phytophthora cinnamomi on Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Ellwoodii. Phytopathol. Pol., 11: 111–120.
 
7.
Orlikowski L.B. 2003. Development and spread of Phytophthora ramorum in the presence of grapefruit extract. J. Plant Protection Res., 43 (3): 13–18.
 
8.
Ouimette D.G., Coffey M.D. 1989. Comparative antifungal activity of four phosphonate compounds against isolates of nine Phytophthora species. Phytopathology 79: 761–767.
 
9.
Staub T., Dahmen H., Schwinn F.J. 1978. Biological characterization of uptake and translocation o f fungicidal acylalanines in grape and tomato plants. J. Plant Disease and Protection 85, 3/4: 162–168.
 
eISSN:1899-007X
ISSN:1427-4345