ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Economical effectiveness of Phytophthora infestans control according to decision support systems
| 1 | Institute of Plant Protection, Miczurina 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland |
| 2 | State Institute for Agronomy and Plant Protection of Rheinland-Pfalz
Essenheimer Str. 144, D-55128 Mainz, German |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Andrzej Wójtowicz
Institute of Plant Protection, Miczurina 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Institute of Plant Protection, Miczurina 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2004;44(4):323–329
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In the field experiments performed in 1999–2001 the profitability of late blight control in accordance with three decision support systems: NegFry ,Simphyt and Stephan with routine fungicide program was compared. Potato protection carried out according to the recommendations of the decision support systems guaranteed higher profitability of late blight control than when potato was protected routinely. The highest profitability was recorded for susceptible variety Bekas pro- tected according to NegFr
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Bugiani R. ,Giovani P. ,Cobelli L. 2000. Field evaluation of the combined use of IPI and different forecasting criteria for potato late blight control. PAV-Special Report No. 6: 266–275.
2.
Fry W.E. ,Shitienberg D. 1990. Integration of host resistance and fungicide to manage potato diseases. Can. J. Plant Pathology 12: 111–116.
3.
Fry W.E. ,Apple A.E. ,Bruhn J.A. 1983. Evaluation of potato blight forecasts modified to incorporate host resistance and fungicide weathering. Phytopathology 73: 1054–1059.
4.
Głuska A. ,Frydecka-Mazurczyk A. ,Lutomirska B. ,Mazurczyk W. ,Rykaczewska K. ,Sowa-Niedziałkowska G. ,Trawczyński C. ,Wierzbicka A. ,Zarzycka K. ,Zgórska K. ,Malinowska E. ,Pietrak J. ,Borys J. ,Kamasa J. 2000. Charakterystyka zrejonizowanych odmian ziemniaka. IHAR Oddział Jadwisin, 30 pp.
5.
Gutsche V. 1998. Usage of model Simphyt in frame of the project Paso in Germany from 1994 to 1997. PAV-Special Report No. 3: 104–11.
6.
Hinds H. 2000. Using disease forecasting to reduce fungicide input for potato blight in the UK. PAV-Special Report No. 6: 83–90.
7.
Lacroix G. ,Latorse M-P. ,Mercer R. 2001. Fenomen: A new fungicide for the control of potato late blight. PAV-Special Report No. 7: 127–133.
8.
Leonard R. ,Dowley L. ,Rice B. ,Ward S. 2001. The use of decision support systems in Ireland for the control of late blight. PAV-Special Report No. 7: 91–98.
9.
Pietkiewicz J. 1992. Strategia zwalczania zarazy ziemniaka w świetle badań krajowych. Materiały 32. Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin, cz. 1: 274–284.
10.
Spits H.G. ,Wander J.G.N. 2001. Field evaluation of four support systems for potato late blight in the Netherlands in 2000. PAV-Special Report No. 7: 77–90.
11.
Stephan S. 1968. Methoden des Warndienst zur gezielten Krautfäulebekämpfung. Nachr. Deutsch. Pflanzenschutzd. DDR 22: 240–244.
12.
Ullrich J. ,Schrödter H. 1966. Das Problem der Vorhersage des Auftretens der Kartoffelkrautfaule ( Phytophthora infestans ) und die Möglichkeit seiner Lösung durch eine „Negativprognose”. Nachrichtenblatt Deut. Pflanzenschutzd., 3: 33–40.
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.