ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Effect of lupin cyclitols on pea aphid probing behaviour
			
	
 
More details
Hide details
	
	
									
				1
				Department of Phytopathology and Entomology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn 
  Prawocheńskiego 17, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
				 
			 
						
				2
				Department of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
  Oczapowskiego 1A, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
				 
			 
						
				3
				Department of Botany and Ecology, University of Zielona Góra, Szafrana 1, 65-516 Zielona Góra, Poland
				 
			 
										
				
				
		
		 
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
							
					    		
    			 
    			
    				    					Corresponding author
    					    				    				
    					Bożena  Kordan 
    					Department of Phytopathology and Entomology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn 
  Prawocheńskiego 17, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
    				
 
    			
				 
    			 
    		 		
			
																											 
		
	 
		
 
 
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2011;51(2):171-178
		
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The  cyclitols:
 d
-pinitol, 
d
-
chiroinositol  are  naturally  present  in  the  tissues  of  
Lupinus angustifolius.
  The  effect  of  these  cyclitols on the behaviour of the pea associated clone of 
Acyrthosiphon pisum 
during various stages of probing was studied. The main 
stage of probing studied was the stylet penetration in mesphyll and vascular bundle. 
d
-pinitol, 
d
-
chironositol and their mixture were 
exogenously applied to pea 
Pisum sativum
 explants and the aphid probing behaviour was evaluated using the Electrical Penetration 
Graph technique (EPG). Feeding of peas with cyclitols at a concentration of 10 mM, caused a selective accumulation of 
d
-pinitol and 
d
-
chiroinositol in stems, leaf petioles, and leaf blades. In aphid bodies, both cyclitols were traced, respectively, to the host plant treatment. The new cyclitols in pea tissues did not significantly affect the total duration and frequency of aphid activities during probing 
in peripheral as well as vascular tissues. However, the aphid behaviour on cyclitol-treated plants as compared to their behaviour on 
the control was slightly altered. Non-probing and probing in mesophyl prevailed among aphid activities during the initial period of 
stylet penetration. Aphids on 
d
-pinitol+
d
-
chiroinositol-treated plants reached phloem vessels relatively later than aphids on the con-
trol and 
d
-
chiroinositol plants. There were recurrent switches between E1 (salivation) and E2 (sap ingestion) patterns in some aphids 
during the phloem phase on 
d
-pinitol 
and 
d
-pinitol+
d
-
chiroinositol – treated plants. This may reflect difficulties in the uptake of the 
phloem sap, and point to lupin cyclitols as being responsible, at least in part, for the rejection of 
L. angustifolius
 as a host plant by the 
pea clone of 
A. pisum
		
	
		
    
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST
    
    	The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
     
REFERENCES (31)
			
	1.
	
		Arndt S.K., Arampatsis C., Foetzki A., Li X., Zeng F.,Zhang X. 2004. Contrasting patterns of leaf solute accumulation and salt adaptation in four phreatophytic desert plants in a hyperarid desert with saline groundwater. J. Arid Environ. 59: 259–270.
		
	 
	 
 			
	2.
	
		Bieleski R.L. 1994. Pinitol is a major carbohydrate in leaves of some coastal plants indigenous to New Zealand. New Zeal. J. Bot. 32: 73–78.
		
	 
	 
 			
	3.
	
		Blackman R.L.,Eastop V.F. 1985. Aphids on the World’s Crops: An Identification Guide. Wiley,Chichester, 466 pp.
		
	 
	 
 			
	4.
	
		Blackman R.L., Eastop V.F. 2007. Taxonomic issues. p. 1–29. In: “Aphids as Crop Pests” (H.F.van Emden, R. Harrington, eds.). CABI, Wallingford, 717 pp.
		
	 
	 
 			
	5.
	
		Campbell B.C.,Binder R.G. 1984. Alfalfa cyclitols in the honeydew of an aphid. Phytochemistry 23: 1786–1787.
		
	 
	 
 			
	6.
	
		Das-Chatterjee A., Goswami L., Maitra S., Dastidar K.G., Ray S.,Majumder A.L. 2006. Introgression of a novel salt-tolerant L-myo-inositol 1-phosphate synthase from Porteresia coarctata (Roxb.) Tateoka (PcIN01) confers salt tolerance to evolutionary diverse organisms. FEBS Lett. 580:3980–3988.
		
	 
	 
 			
	7.
	
		del Campo M.L., Via S.,Caillaud M.C. 2003. Recognition of hostspecific chemical stimulants in two sympatric host races of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Ecol. Entomol. 28: 405–412.
		
	 
	 
 			
	8.
	
		Dreyer D.L., Binder R.G., Chan B.G., Waiss Jr A.G., Hartwig E.E., Beland G.L. 1979. Pinitol, a larval growth inhibitor for Heliothis zea in soybeans. Experientia 35: 1182–1183.
		
	 
	 
 			
	9.
	
		Gabryś B.,Pawluk M.1999. Acceptability of different species of Brassicaceae as hosts for the cabbage aphid. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91: 105–109.
		
	 
	 
 			
	10.
	
		Gabryś B.,Tjallingii W.F. 2002. The role of sinigrin in host plant recognition by aphids during initial plant penetration. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104: 89–93.
		
	 
	 
 			
	11.
	
		Glendinning J.I., Nelson N.M.,Bernays E.A. 2000. How do inositol and glucose modulate feeding in Manduca sextacaterpillars? J. Exp. Biol. 203: 1299–1315.
		
	 
	 
 			
	12.
	
		Hendrix D.L., Salvucci M.E. 1998. Polyol metabolism in homopterans at high temperatures: of mannitol in aphids (Aphididae: Homoptera) and sorbitol in whiteflies (Aleyrodidae: Homoptera). Comp. Biochem. Physiol., A 120: 487–494.
		
	 
	 
 			
	13.
	
		Katis N.I., Tsitsipis J.A., Stevens M., Powell G. 2007. Transmission of plant viruses. p. 353–390. In: “Aphids as Crop Pests” (H.F. van Emden,R. Harrington, eds.). CABI, Wallingford, 717 pp.
		
	 
	 
 			
	14.
	
		Klingler J., Powell G., Thompson G.A.,Isaacs R. 1998. Phloem specific aphid resistance in Cucumis melo line AR 5: effects on feeding behaviour and performance of Aphis gossypii. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 86: 79–88.
		
	 
	 
 			
	15.
	
		Kordan B. 2006. Comparison of Yellow Lupine (Lupinus luteus L.) and Narrow-leaf Lupine (Lupinus angustifolius L.) as Host Plants for Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warminsko-Mazurskiego. Dissertations and Monographs 118, Olsztyn, 76 pp.
		
	 
	 
 			
	16.
	
		Kordan B., Gabrys B., Dancewicz K., Lahuta L.B., Piotrowicz-Cieślak A.,Rowinska E. 2008. European yellow lupine, Lupinus luteus, and narrow-leaf lupine, Lupinus angustifolius, as hosts for the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Entomol. Exp. Appl.128: 139–146.
		
	 
	 
 			
	17.
	
		Lahuta L.B. 2006. Biosynthesis of raffinose family oligosaccharides and galactosyl pinitols in developing and maturing seeds of winter vetch (Vicia villosaRoth.). Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 75: 219–227.
		
	 
	 
 			
	18.
	
		Lahuta L.B., Górecki R.J.,Horbowicz M. 2005a. High concentra-tions of d-pinitol or d-chiroinositol inhibit the biosynthesis of raffinose family oligosaccharides in maturing smooth tare [Vicia tetrasperma(L.) Schreb.] seeds. Acta Physiol. Plant. 27: 505–513.
		
	 
	 
 			
	19.
	
		Lahuta L.B., Horbowicz M., Gojło E., Goszczyńska J.,Górecki R.J. 2005b. Exogenously applied D-pinitol and D-chiroinositol modifies the accumulation of α-d-galactosides in developing tiny vetch [Vicia hirsuta(L.) S.F. Gray] seeds. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 74: 287–296.
		
	 
	 
 			
	20.
	
		Leszczyński B., Matok H.,Dixon A.F.G. 1992. Resistance of cereals to aphids: The interaction between hydroxamic acids and UDP-glucose transferases in the aphid Sitobion avenue(Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Chem. Ecol. 18: 1189–1200.
		
	 
	 
 			
	21.
	
		Loewus F.A.,Murthy P.P.N. 2000. Myoinositol metabolism in plants. Plant Sci. 150: 1–19.
		
	 
	 
 			
	22.
	
		Mayoral A.M., Tjallingii W.F.,Castañera P. 1996. Probing behaviour of Diuraphis noxia on five cereal species with different hydroxyamic acid levels. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 78: 341–348.
		
	 
	 
 			
	23.
	
		Merchant A., Tausz M., Arndt S.K., Adams M.A. 2006. Cyclitols and carbohydrates in leaves and roots of 13 Eucalyptus species suggest contrasting physiological responses to water deficit. Plant, Cell Environ. 29: 2017–2029.
		
	 
	 
 			
	24.
	
		Michell R.H. 2008. Inositol derivatives: evolution and functions. Nature Reviews. Mol. Cell Biol. 9: 151–161.
		
	 
	 
 			
	25.
	
		Pettersson J., Tjallingii W.F.,Hardie J. 2007. Host-plant selection and feeding. p. 87–113. In: “Aphids as Crop Pests” (H.F.van Emden, R.Harrington, eds.). CABI, Wallingford, 717 pp.
		
	 
	 
 			
	26.
	
		Rahbe Y., Febvay G., Delobel B.,Bourneville R. 1988. Acyrthosiphon pisum performance in response to the sugar and amino acid composition of artificial diets, and its relation to lucerne varietal resistance. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 48: 283–292.
		
	 
	 
 			
	27.
	
		Sandström J.,Pettersson J. 1994. Performance of pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) clones on host plants and synthetic diets mimicking the same plants phloem amino acid composition. J. Insect Physiol. 40: 1051–1057.
		
	 
	 
 			
	28.
	
		Szczeciński P., Gryff-Keller A., Horbowicz A.,Lahuta L.B. 2000. Galactosylpinitols isolated from vetch (Vicia Villona Roth.) seeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48: 2717–2720.
		
	 
	 
 			
	29.
	
		Tjallingii W.F. 1995. Regulation of phloem sap feeding by aphids. p. 190–209. In: “Regulatory Mechanisms in Insect Feeding” (R.F. Chapman, G.de Boer, eds.). Chapman,Hall, New York, NY, 390 pp.
		
	 
	 
 			
	30.
	
		Via S. 1999. Reproductive isolation between sympatric races of pea aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evolution 53: 1446–1457.
		
	 
	 
 			
	31.
	
		Wilkinson T.L., Ashford D.A., Pritchard J., Douglas A.E. 1997. Honeydew sugars and osmoregulation in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. J. Exp. Biol. 200: 2137–2143.