ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Seed treatment strategies combining Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and insecticides for management of the emerging soil pest Scutigerella immaculata in soybean
More details
Hide details
1
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Proteção de Plantas, Centro de Excelência em Bioinsumos (CEBIO), Instituto Federal Goiano- Campus Urutaí, Rodovia Prof. Geraldo Silva Nascimento, Urutaí-GO, Brazil
2
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí - Campus Professora Cinobelina Elvas, (CPCE), Planalto Horizonte-BR Bom Jesus, Brazil
3
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Bioenergia e Grãos, Instituto Federal Goiano, Campus Rio Verde, Rodovia Sul Goiana, Rio Verde-GO, Brazil
4
Unidade de Biociência, Curso de Agronomia., Centro Universitário de Mineiros, Mineiros-GO, Brazil
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
Submission date: 2026-05-04
Acceptance date: 2026-07-28
Online pre-proof publication date: 2026-08-28
Corresponding author
João Batista Coelho Sobrinho
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Proteção de Plantas, Centro de Excelência em Bioinsumos (CEBIO), Instituto Federal Goiano- Campus Urutaí, Rodovia Prof. Geraldo Silva Nascimento, Urutaí-GO, Brazil
HIGHLIGHTS
- Seed treatment reduced populations of Scutigerella immaculata in soybean
- Combination of insecticide and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens improved plant development
- Root sampling was more efficient than bait traps
- Pest peaks occurred between 60 and 90 days after planting
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Scutigerella immaculata (Symphyla: Scutigerellidae) causes increasing problems in soybean-producing areas of Brazil, particularly in MATOPIBAPA, one of the country’s most recent agricultural frontiers. This study evaluated soybean seed treatments for the control of S. immaculata, using Bacillus amyloliquefaciens applied alone or combined with chemical insecticides. It also assessed pest sampling methods and soybean responses to these treatments. Soybean seeds were treated on the day of planting in the municipality of Açailândia, Maranhão State, Brazil. The experiment was conducted under field conditions in a completely randomized design with nine treatments and four replicates. The treatments (T) were T1: untreated control, T2: fipronil, T3: bifenthrin + imidacloprid, T4: clothianidin, T5: B. amyloliquefaciens, T6: clothianidin + fipronil, T7: clothianidin + lambda-cyhalothrin, T8: clothianidin + fipronil + B. amyloliquefaciens, and T9: cyantraniliprole + lambda-cyhalothrin + thiamethoxam + abamectin. Scutigerella immaculata was sampled using potato baits placed in the soil and by direct counting on plant roots. Evaluated parameters included plant height, seedling emergence, seed germination, and fresh root and shoot mass, which showed significant differences between treatments. Direct counting on plant roots detected more individuals than bait sampling. Among the treatments, T7 resulted in the lowest mean number of S. immaculata individuals. Pest population peaks occurred between 60 and 90 days after planting. Further studies are needed to clarify the effectiveness of the evaluated biological product and to determine the contribution of soybean seed treatment to the control and integrated management of this emerging pest.
FUNDING
The research received financial support from Centro de Excelência em Bioinsumos (CE-358 BIo) and from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Goiás (FAPEG).
RESPONSIBLE EDITOR
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (45)
1.
Araújo M.L.S., Rufino I.A.A., Silva F.B., Brito H.C., Santos J.R.N. 2024. The Relationship between Climate, Agriculture and Land Cover in Matopiba, Brazil (1985–2020). Sustainability 16 (7): 2670. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1607....
2.
Backer R., Rokem J.S., Ilangumaran G., Lamont J., Praslickova D., Ricci E., Subramanian S., Smith D.L. 2018. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture.
4.
Bateman C., Willette A., Kaur N., Dorman S.J., Buckland K., Anderson N.P. 2023. Symphylan Control in Grass Grown for Seed, 2022. Arthropod Management Tests 48 (1): e013. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1093/amt/ts....
5.
Benjamin J.G., Nielsen D.C. 2004. A method to separate plant roots from soil and analyze root surface area. Plant and Soil 267 (1): 225-234. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104....
6.
Bork C.R., Almeida A.S., Castellano C.S., Zimmer G., Avila T.D., Meneghello G.E., Dellaostin S.M., Rodrigues D.B., Mattos F., Rossetti C., Fonseca H.W., Tunes C., Suñé A.S., Barreto B., Tunes L.M., Suchch L.O.B. 2018. Soybean industrial seed treatment: effect on physiological quality during storage. Journal of Agricultural Science 10 (8): 468-476. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v1....
7.
Bortoletto W.V., Macedo W.R., Oliveira T.C., Souza D.S. 2017. Agrochemicals and storage times on soybean seed vigor. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 52 (2): 129-132. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-....
8.
Bovi T.S., Zaluski R., Orsi R.O. 2018. Toxicity and motor changes in africanized honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) exposed to fipronil and imidacloprid. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 90 (1): 239-245. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3....
9.
Brzezinski C.R., Henning A.A., Abati J., Henning F.A., França-Neto J.D.B., Krzyzanowski F.C., Zucareli C. 2015. Seeds treatment times in the establishment and yield performance of soybean crops. Journal of Seed Science 37 (2): 147-153. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1....
10.
Caulier S., Nannan C., Gillis A., Licciardi F., Bragard C., Mahillon J. 2019. Overview of the antimicrobial compounds produced by members of the Bacillus subtilis group. Frontiers in Microbiology 10: 302. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.....
11.
Czembor E., Tratwal A., Pukacki J., Krystek M., Czembor, J.H. 2025. Managing fungal pathogens of field crops in sustainable agriculture and AgroVariety internet application as a case study. Journal of Plant Protection Research 65 (1): 1-26. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.24425/jppr.....
12.
Fabiano A.R., Schwan-Estrada K.R.F., Robinson L.C., Guilherme B.P.B., Rodrigo R., Rafael B.B., Valdenir C. 2018. Agronomic performance of soybean treated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. African Journal of Microbiology Research 12 (45): 1020-1027. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR20....
13.
Ferreira T.F., Oliveira J.A., Carvalho R.A.D., Resende L.S., Lopes C.G.M., Ferreira V.D.F. 2016. Quality of soybean seeds treated with fungicides and insecticides before and after storage. Journal of Seed Science 38 (4): 278-286. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1....
14.
Gandini E.M.M., Costa E.S.P., Santos J.B., Soares M.A., Barroso G.M., Corrêa J.M., Carvalho A.G., Zanuncio J.C. 2020. Compatibility of pesticides and/or fertilizers in tank mixtures. Journal of Cleaner Production 268: 122152. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
17.
Jin Y.L., Godeiro N.N., Bu Y. 2023. Description of the first species of Scutigerella (Symphyla, Scutigerellidae) from China, with mitogenomic and genetic divergence analysis. ZooKeys 1157: 145-161. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookey....
18.
Joseph S.V. 2015. Effects of direct and indirect exposure of insecticides to garden Symphylan (Symphyla: Scutigerellidae) in laboratory bioassays. Journal of economic entomology 108 (6): 2729-2736. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/to....
19.
Joseph S.V., Martin T., Steinmann K., Kosina P. 2017. Outlook of pyrethroid insecticides for pest management in the Salinas Valley of California. Journal of Integrated Pest Management 8 (1): 1-11. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/p....
20.
Lamichhane J.R., You M.P., Laudinot V., Barbetti M.J. Aubertot J. N. 2020. Revisiting sustainability of fungicide seed treatments for field crops. Plant Disease 104 (3): 610-623. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-0....
21.
Laurance W.F., Lovejoy T.E., Vasconcelos H.L., Bruna E.M., Didham R.K., Stouffer P.C., Gascon C., Bierregaard R.O., Laurance S.G., Sampaio E. 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐year investigation. Conservation biology 16 (3): 605-618. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523....
22.
Loureiro M.C., Galvão J.D. 1970. Nota sobre Hanseniella sp. (Symphyla) praga de arroz (Oryza sativa L.) em Viçosa, Minas Gerais. Revista Ceres 17 (91): 86-90. Doi:
https://ojs.ceres.ufv.br/ceres....
23.
Ma C.S., Wang B.X., Wang, X.J., Lin Q.C., Zhang W., Yang X.F., Baaren J.V., Bebber D.P., Eigenbrode S.D., Zalucki M.P, Zeng J., Ma G. 2025. Crop pest responses to global changes in climate and land management. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 6: 264–283. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017....
24.
Marchesini V.A., Town J., Tenuta M., Pereira F.G, Shaw L., Sharpe S., Schoenau J., Hubbard M. 2025. Spiral nematodes, soil microbiome and micronutrients increase chickpea drought susceptibility but do not induce symptoms of the emerging health issue. Scientific Reports 15: 39823. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598....
26.
Martinelli L.A., Batistella M., Silva R.F.B.D., Moran E. 2017. Soy expansion and socioeconomic development in municipalities of Brazil. Land. 6 (3): 62. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/land60....
27.
Morais J.W., Silva E.P. 2010. Occurrence of Symphyla (Myriapoda) in the region of the Upper Solimões River, Amazonas, Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 44 (8): 981–983. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-....
28.
Oliveira Aparecido L.E., Dutra A.F., Lorençone P.A., Alcântara Neto F., Lorençone J.A., Leite M.R.L. 2023. Climate change in MATOPIBA region of Brazil: a study on climate extremes in agriculture: Climate change in MATOPIBA region of Brazil: a study on climate extremes in agriculture. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 153 (1): 87-100. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704....
29.
Pereira R.C., Pelloso M.F., Correia L.V., Matera T.C., Dos Santos R.F., Braccini A.L., Bastiani G.G., Coppo C., Silva B.G. 2020. Physiological quality of soybean seeds treated with imidacloprid before and after storage. Plant, Soil and Environment 66: 513-518. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.17221/364/2....
30.
Rabbee M.F., Ali M.S., Choi J., Hwang B.S., Jeong S.C., Baek K.H. 2019. Bacillus velezensis: a valuable member of bioactive molecules within plant microbiomes. Molecules 24 (6):1046. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecu....
31.
Rakes M., Grützmacher A.D., Pazini J.B., Pasini R.A., Schaedler C.E. 2017. Physicochemical compatibility of agrochemical mixtures in spray tanks for paddy field rice crops. Planta Daninha. 35: e017165185. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-....
32.
Reed G.F., Lynn F., Meade B.D. 2002. Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 9 (6): 1235-1239. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.9....
33.
Ribeiro Junior J.I., Melo A.L.P. 2009. Guia prático para utilização do SAEG. Folha Artes Graficas Ltd.a. Viçosa (UFV), Brazil. 287 p.
34.
Ribeiro W.R.M., Pacheco L.P., Monteiro F.P., Petter F.A.E., Carvalho W.L., Oliveira Sousa T., Gualberto A.V.S., Alcântara Neto F. 2014. Fungicides phytotonic action on the development of soybean. African Journal of Agricultural Research 9 (44): 3283-3290. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR20....
35.
Santos R.S., Zhang Y., Cotrufo M.F., Hong M., Oliveira D.M.S., Damian J.M., Cerri C.E.P. 2023. Simulating soil C dynamics under intensive agricultural systems and climate change scenarios in the Matopiba region, Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management 347: 119149. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
36.
Sentelhas P.C., Battist R., Câmara G.M.D.S., Farias J.R.B., Hampf A.C., Nendel C. 2015. The soybean yield gap in Brazil – magnitude, causes and possible solutions for sustainable production. The journal of agricultural science 153 (8): 1394-1411. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1017/S00218....
37.
Siqueira M.S., Silva M.T., Brito J.I.B., Braga C.C., Souza A.C., Sousa W.G. 2024. Índices climáticos extremos de precipitação pluvial e temperatura do ar na região do MATOPIBA-Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física 17 (1): 446–464. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.....
38.
Souza R., Teixeira I., Reis E., Silva A. 2016. Soybean morphophysiology and yield response to seeding systems and plant populations. Chilean journal of agricultural research 76 (1): 3-8. Doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S071....
39.
Swenson K.G. 1966. Infection of the garden symphylan, Scutigerella immaculata, with the DD-136 nematode. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 8 (1): 133-134. Doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022....
40.
Umble J.R., Fisher J.R. 2003. Influence of below-ground feeding by garden symphylans (Scutigerella immaculata Newport) on plant health. Environmental Entomology 32 (5): 1251–1261. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-2....
41.
Vanolli B.S., Andrade N., Canisares L.P., Franco A.L.C., Pereira A.P.A., Cherubin M. R. 2024. Edaphic mesofauna responses to land use change for sugarcane cultivation: insights from contrasting soil textures. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 11. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2....
42.
Vasques, N.C., Nogueira M. A., Hungria M. 2024. Increasing Application of Multifunctional Bacillus for Biocontrol of Pests and Diseases and Plant Growth Promotion: Lessons from Brazil. Agronomy 14 (8):1654. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/agrono....
43.
Waterhouse, J.S. 1968. Studies on the garden symphylan, Scutigerella immaculata (Symphyla: Scutigerellidae). The Canadian Entomologist 100 (2): 172-178. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent100....
44.
Zalila-Kolsi, I., Ben-Mahmoud, A., & Al-Barazie, R. 2023. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens: Harnessing Its Potential for Industrial, Medical, and Agricultural Applications—A Comprehensive Review. Microorganisms 11 (9): 2215. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/microo....
45.
Zandona R.R., Pazdiora P.C., Pazini J.D.B., Seidel E.J., Ethur L.Z. 2019. Chemical and biological seed treatment and their effect on soybean development and yield. Revista Caatinga 32 (2): 559-565. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-2....